The verses describe two different matters: the language in which a messenger first explains revelation to his immediate audience, and the extent to which his message is binding. Muhammad (PBUH) was Arabic-speaking, but the Quran presents his mission as universal through translation, teaching, and transmission.
Why the verses seem to pull apart
The objection has real force if Qur'an 14:4 is read as saying that every messenger must be sent only to people who share his language, and that he must personally visit every nation. Muhammad (PBUH) spoke Arabic, yet Qur'an 7:158 and 34:28 describe him as sent to all mankind. Most people would encounter his message through other languages, and many would never meet him. On that reading, his mission appears unlike the earlier prophetic pattern. The appeal to Qur'an 46:9 then asks why he would deny being something unprecedented.
What "the language of his people" actually establishes
We never sent a messenger except in the language of his people so he could make the message clear to them.
Quran 14:4
The verse gives the reason: clarity for the first audience. It does not say, "No messenger may address anyone outside that language," nor does it say that a messenger must personally travel to every person who will later receive his message. The Quran itself describes its warning as reaching people through transmission:
This Quran has been revealed to me so that I may warn you with it and whoever it reaches.
Quran 6:19
That is exactly how a universal revelation would naturally spread. Its first hearers receive it in the prophet's language; others receive its meaning through teachers and translations. The requirement of clarity is preserved, even though the messenger's physical presence is not universal.
Universal mission is not the same as universal language
The Quran explicitly distinguishes Muhammad's mission:
Say, O humanity! I am Allah's Messenger to you all.
Quran 7:158
The Prophet (PBUH) also said, "Every prophet was sent only to his own nation, but I was sent to all people." This is recorded in Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. Earlier prophets addressed particular peoples, while Muhammad (PBUH) brought the final message for humanity. That message could be conveyed beyond Arabia without requiring him to learn every language or personally visit every land.
What Qur'an 46:9 means
When Muhammad (PBUH) says, "I am not something unprecedented among the messengers," the immediate context is that he follows revelation and does not control his own destiny. Classical commentators such as al-Tabari and Ibn Kathir understood the statement as denying that he invented a new kind of religion or stood outside the prophetic tradition. It does not mean that every circumstance of his mission must be identical to every earlier prophet's mission. A final universal messenger can differ in scope while remaining fully within the established pattern of revelation.
Thus, the argument identifies a tension only if it adds two premises the Quran does not state: that 14:4 limits a prophet's entire audience to his own language, and that universal guidance requires personal travel. Without those assumptions, the verses are complementary, not contradictory.