Among the signs mentioned by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) is a painful social change: people cutting off family ties. Islam does not present this as a trivial moral complaint, but as a symptom of a deeper breakdown - when convenience, money, ego and individual preference begin to outweigh the sacred duties owed to parents, siblings, children and relatives.

For a sceptical reader, the question is not simply, "Have families ever had conflict?" They always have. The more serious question is whether the Prophet (PBUH), speaking in a strongly tribal society where family bonds were central to survival and identity, pointed to a future in which those bonds would be widely weakened and treated casually. The evidence is modest, but meaningful.

The prophecy: cutting family ties before the Hour

One report from 'Abd Allah ibn Mas'ud describes a cluster of social signs that would appear before the Hour:

"Before the Hour there will be selective greetings, trade will become widespread until a woman helps her husband in trade, ties of kinship will be cut, false testimony will appear, true testimony will be concealed, and the pen will become widespread." Reported in Musnad Ahmad from 'Abd Allah ibn Mas'ud. The chain of Ahmad's report was graded sahih by Ahmad Shakir, and the report was also authenticated by al-Albani. It is not a hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari or Sahih Muslim.

This matters because the report does not mention cutting family ties in isolation. It places it within a broader social picture: commerce becoming widespread, women participating in business, writing and documentation spreading, greetings becoming more selective, and public truthfulness weakening. In other words, it describes a world more mobile, transactional, literate and socially fragmented than the Arabian tribal environment in which the Prophet (PBUH) lived.

That does not mean every part of the hadith was absent in the seventh century. Women traded then; Khadijah (may Allah be pleased with her) was a noble businesswoman. People lied then, and families quarrelled then. The point is not absolute novelty. The point is spread, normalisation and intensification.

What Islam means by family ties

The Arabic term often used is silat al-rahim, maintaining the bonds of the womb. It refers to honouring the relationships Allah created through blood and family: parents, children, siblings, uncles, aunts and other relatives, with the strongest duties owed to the closest relatives.

The Qur'an speaks about these ties with remarkable seriousness:

"So would you perhaps, if you turned away, cause corruption on earth and sever your ties of kinship? Those are the ones Allah has cursed, so He deafened them and blinded their sight." - Qur'an 47:22-23

And in another verse:

"And fear Allah, through whom you ask one another, and the wombs. Indeed, Allah is ever watching over you." - Qur'an 4:1

The Prophet (PBUH) also warned severely against unjustly cutting relatives off:

"The one who cuts off ties of kinship will not enter Paradise." Sahih al-Bukhari, 5984; Sahih Muslim, 2556.

This does not mean Islam commands a person to remain in danger or accept abuse. Scholars distinguish between maintaining family ties and allowing oppression. Sometimes maintaining ties may be a phone call, a message, financial help, polite distance, or refusing to return harm with harm. Cutting ties, in the blameworthy sense, is the unjust abandonment of family rights due to pride, resentment, greed, convenience or worldly competition.

Why this was striking in the Prophet's world

To appreciate the sign, we should remember the society in which it was spoken. Seventh-century Arabia was not an individualistic society built around isolated nuclear households. One's tribe and family were protection, identity, economic support, social status and legal security. A person without kinship support was vulnerable.

This is why the Qur'an's moral reform was not asking people to invent family loyalty from nothing. Arabs already valued lineage. Islam redirected that loyalty: family ties were to be upheld for Allah's sake, not used to defend oppression, tribal arrogance or injustice.

So when a prophetic report mentions the cutting of kinship ties as a sign before the Hour, it is not merely saying, "Some relatives will argue." It is pointing to the weakening of something that pre-modern societies naturally relied upon. The remarkable development in the modern world is not that family conflict exists; it is that many people can now live for years with minimal dependence on extended family, and sometimes with little sense of obligation toward them.

How this sign is visible today

Modern life has brought many blessings: safer travel, education, medicine, communication and economic opportunity. Islam does not reject those benefits. But the same forces have also made it easier to detach from relatives. People migrate far from parents, build lives around careers, interact through screens, and form social circles based on preference rather than obligation.

In many places, family relationships are increasingly treated like optional friendships: maintained if emotionally satisfying, dropped if inconvenient. Elderly parents may be left lonely even when their children are financially comfortable. Siblings may stop speaking over inheritance disputes. Relatives may be blocked, ignored or excluded over minor disagreements. Weddings, funerals and family gatherings can become sites of rivalry rather than mercy.

Again, we should be fair: some estrangement follows real harm, addiction, violence, manipulation or abuse. Islam is not asking the victim to pretend evil did not happen. But that painful category does not explain the wider casualness with which many people now abandon relatives over pride, politics, money, lifestyle differences or old grudges.

The strongest counterargument

A thoughtful sceptic may say: "This is not a miracle. Families have always broken apart. Ancient history is full of family betrayal, inheritance fights and tribal wars. Predicting family breakdown is too general."

That objection has force. We should not exaggerate this sign into a mathematical proof. It is true that cutting ties existed before Islam. The sons of Adam had conflict. The brothers of Yusuf (Joseph), peace be upon him, wronged him. The Qur'an itself mentions family hostility. Therefore, the prophecy cannot honestly be framed as "no one ever cut family ties until modern times."

The better answer is that Islamic fulfilled prophecies often work cumulatively. This report describes a pattern, not a single isolated event: selective greetings, expanded commerce, documentation and writing becoming widespread, women participating in trade, false testimony spreading, true testimony being concealed, and family ties being cut. The modern reader can recognise the whole social atmosphere: more commerce, more paperwork and literacy, more public communication, yet often less deep loyalty and moral responsibility.

Another objection is that the prophecy could be self-fulfilling: Muslims heard it, then acted it out. But this is not persuasive here. Islam strongly commands the opposite. A Muslim who cuts family ties is not fulfilling a religious instruction; he is falling into a sin that the Prophet (PBUH) warned against. Also, the weakening of family ties is not limited to Muslims. It is a broad human trend tied to urbanisation, economic pressure, mobility and cultural individualism.

A sign, not an excuse for despair

The purpose of signs of the Hour is not entertainment, panic or superiority over others. They are meant to wake the conscience. If the Prophet (PBUH) warned that family ties would be cut, the believer's response is not to say, "This was predicted, so nothing can be done." The response is to resist the trend.

The Prophet (PBUH) defined true family maintenance beautifully:

"The one who maintains ties is not the one who merely reciprocates. Rather, the one who maintains ties is the one who, when his relatives cut him off, maintains ties with them." Sahih al-Bukhari, 5991.

This is a demanding moral standard. It means not letting another person's coldness define your character. It means asking: Have I called my parents? Have I checked on my siblings? Have I forgiven what can be forgiven? Have I helped a relative in need? Have I allowed money, ego or old anger to become more important than what Allah joined together?

Conclusion

The prophecy about cutting off family ties is not a flashy prediction, and it should not be overstated. Family conflict is ancient, and not every separation is sinful. Yet the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) identified the severing of kinship as part of a wider social pattern before the Hour - a pattern that feels increasingly familiar in the modern world.

For the sincere reader, this is one more sign among many: a morally precise warning from a Prophet who did not merely describe rituals, but diagnosed the future wounds of human society. And for the believer, it is also a personal call: in an age of broken ties, be someone who reconnects what Allah loves to be connected.