In this article, we will explore what jihad truly means in Islamic law (fiqh). We will see how the Quran and the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) define jihad, and how classical scholars and the major Islamic law schools understood it. You will discover that Islam's rules for jihad emphasize mercy, justice, and self-discipline. Far from being a reckless "holy war," jihad in fiqh is a carefully regulated duty intended to uphold peace and protect the oppressed. By understanding the concept of jihad properly, we can appreciate the wisdom of Islam's teachings and see the balance Islam strikes between courage and compassion.

What Does "Jihad" Mean?

Jihad (جهاد) is an Arabic word meaning "striving" or "struggle." It comes from the root j-h-d, which means to exert effort or to struggle. In Islamic terminology, jihad has a broad meaning. It refers to any struggle one undertakes for the sake of God and goodness. This can take many forms:

  • Personal jihad: striving to resist one's own evil inclinations, temptations, and ego. For example, fighting the urge to lie, or pushing oneself to perform the daily prayers, are forms of personal jihad.
  • Verbal jihad: speaking the truth, spreading the message of Islam, or standing up against injustice through words. Teaching others about Islam or saying a just word to a tyrant is considered a type of jihad.
  • Physical jihad: this includes striving with one's own body or wealth in the path of Allah. It can mean charitable work, community service, or in a narrower sense, fighting to defend the community when attacked.

It's important to know that jihad does not equal war or fighting by default. The concept is much wider, and armed jihad is only one type of jihad, engaged in under specific conditions. Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) taught that the greatest jihad is against one's own soul's desires. In one authentic narration, he said:

The mujahid (true striver) is the one who fights against his own self (nafs) for Allah's obedience. (Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhi 1621)

This Hadith highlights that our first battlefield is within ourselves. Overcoming pride, greed, anger, and selfishness in order to become a better person is a form of jihad every Muslim must undertake daily. Similarly, the Prophet (ﷺ) also said:

The best jihad is a word of truth in front of a tyrannical ruler. (Source: Sunan al-Nasa'i 4209)

Speaking truth to power and standing for justice, even when it's dangerous to do so, is considered a supreme form of jihad. This shows the moral dimension of jihad, it's about doing what is right and defending the rights of others, not about aggression.

Thus, at its core, jihad means striving in the way of God. It encapsulates both inner spiritual struggle and external effort. In many ways, jihad can be seen as the act of diligently living one's faith and overcoming the challenges that come with that. Every Muslim is called to jihad in some form, because life itself is a test that requires effort to remain on the path of truth and righteousness.

Jihad in the Quran

The Quran speaks about jihad in numerous verses, addressing its different aspects. Some verses talk about fighting oppressors, some about striving with one's wealth and self, and others about patience and perseverance in jihad. To understand the Quranic perspective, let's look at key Quran verses related to jihad (struggle and fighting in the cause of Allah):

Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed, Allah does not like transgressors. - (Quran 2:190).

(This verse establishes that fighting is only allowed against aggressors - those who fight you - and even then, Muslims are commanded not to go beyond proper limits.)

And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, for persecution is worse than killing. And do not fight them at the Sacred Mosque unless they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them - such is the recompense of the disbelievers. But if they cease, then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. - (Quran 2:191-192).

(These verses were revealed regarding a particular injustice: the enemies had driven Muslims out of their homes and persecuted them. The Quran told the Muslims to fight back to stop persecution ("fitnah," which means oppression or religious persecution). Yet, if the enemy stops their aggression, Muslims must also stop fighting, showing forgiveness and mercy.)

Fight them until there is no more persecution and [until] worship is [freely] for Allah. But if they cease, then there is to be no aggression [against anyone] except against the oppressors. - (Quran 2:193).

(The goal of fighting here is clearly stated: to end persecution and allow freedom of religion. The verse again emphasizes that if the oppressors stop their aggression, Muslims should also stop - any further fighting would be aggression, which Islam forbids.)

Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. Perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you, and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. Allah knows, and you do not know. - (Quran 2:216).

(This verse acknowledges that fighting is difficult and something people naturally dislike. Yet, there are times when it becomes necessary and morally good - for example, to defend against tyranny. God knows the wisdom behind such trials even if we find them hard.)

And what is [the matter] with you that you fight not in the cause of Allah and for the oppressed men, women, and children who cry out, 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town of oppressors and appoint for us from Yourself a protector and appoint for us from Yourself a helper'? - (Quran 4:75).

(Here the Quran calls the believers to fight to protect the oppressed - those weak people (men, women, and children) who were suffering under persecution. Fighting in the cause of Allah includes rescuing people from injustice and tyranny.)

Those who believe fight in the way of Allah, and those who disbelieve fight in the way of Taghut (evil). So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak. - (Quran 4:76).

(This verse contrasts motivations: true believers fight for the cause of God (justice, truth, peace), whereas the enemies at that time fought for false causes or oppression. It reminds Muslims that when they do fight, their intention must be pure - for Allah's cause, not for worldly gain.)

Not equal are those believers who sit [at home] and receive no harm and those who strive in the cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred those who strive with their wealth and lives over those who remain [behind] by degrees. And to all, Allah has promised good, but He has preferred the strivers over those who remain [behind] with a great reward. - (Quran 4:95).

(This verse honors the mujahideen - those who struggle and make sacrifices - by saying they are not equal to those who do nothing in times of need. While all believers who are faithful will have goodness, those who put themselves forward and strive hard for Allah's cause achieve a higher status and reward.)

Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Quran. - (Quran 9:111).

(This powerful verse describes the devotion of true believers: they are willing to give up their lives and wealth for Allah's cause, and in return Allah promises them Paradise. It underlines that jihad, when undertaken sincerely for Allah, is a deed of great sacrifice and value - a fulfillment of God's promise across scriptures.)

O you who have believed, what is [the matter] with you that, when you are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, you cling heavily to the earth? ... If you do not go forth, He will punish you with a painful punishment and will replace you with another people. - (Quran 9:38-39).

(These verses scold those who hesitate to stand up for justice. In the context of an urgent call to defend the Muslim community, some were reluctant. The Quran warns against love of comfort when duty calls, and it emphasizes that turning away from a just cause leads to loss and could even bring God's punishment.)

Go forth, whether light or heavy, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the cause of Allah. That is better for you, if you only knew. - (Quran 9:41).

(This verse commands the believers to mobilize for jihad (in this context, a defensive campaign) without excuses - "light or heavy" meaning both young or old, lightly armed or heavily armed, in all conditions do what you can. Striving with both wealth and life indicates supporting the cause financially and physically. Doing so is "better for you," meaning it brings goodness in this life and the next.)

Those who believe in Allah and the Last Day would not ask your permission to be excused from striving with their wealth and their lives. And Allah is Knowing of those who fear Him. - (Quran 9:44).

(This verse commends the sincere believers who don't try to avoid participating in a necessary jihad. At the time, some hypocrites would give excuses to avoid joining the Prophet (ﷺ) in difficult expeditions. True faith, however, motivates a person to step up when needed.)

O Prophet, strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell... - (Quran 9:73).

(Here Allah orders the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) to strive (jahid) against both open enemies (hostile disbelievers at war with the Muslim community) and the hypocrites (those pretending to be Muslim while betraying the community). Striving against hypocrites usually meant exposing their schemes and admonishing them, not physical fighting, since hypocrites lived among the Muslims. This verse shows jihad can also mean using firm resolve, discipline, and taking stance against treachery and falsehood internally.)

And if any one of the polytheists seeks your protection [O Muhammad], then grant him protection so that he may hear the words of Allah. Then deliver him to a place of safety for him. That is because they are people who do not know. - (Quran 9:6).

(This remarkable verse comes right after verses in Surah 9 commanding fighting against the treacherous pagan enemies. It instructs that if an enemy fighter surrenders or seeks asylum, the Muslims must protect him and convey to him the teachings of Islam, and then escort him to safety. In other words, even in the middle of war, Islam commands mercy and justice: no harm should come to non-combatants or anyone who lays down arms.)

And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah. Indeed, He is the Hearing, the Knowing. - (Quran 8:61).

(This verse commands the Prophet (ﷺ) and the Muslims that if the enemy shows an inclination towards peace, Muslims should accept that and make peace as well. War in Islam is not about extermination - it should end the moment the enemy is ready for peace. Allah encourages trust in Him during peacemaking, meaning Muslims shouldn't fear that making peace will make them weak; doing the right thing is always supported by Allah.)

So do not obey the disbelievers, and strive against them with it [the Quran] a great striving. - (Quran 25:52).

(This verse was revealed in Mecca before any physical fighting was allowed. It shows another form of jihad: using the Quran's message to strive against falsehood. In that early period, Muslims were instructed to resist oppression through patience, preaching, and moral courage. "Strive with the Quran" means to counter the arguments and pressures of the unbelievers with the truth of the Quran - a great jihad through faith and words, not through the sword.)

And those who strive for Us - We will surely guide them to Our paths. And indeed, Allah is with the doers of good. - (Quran 29:69).

(This is a general verse about striving (jihad) in God's cause. It promises that whoever struggles and makes effort for the sake of Allah will find guidance. Allah will open the paths of goodness for them. It's a comforting verse showing that any form of sincere jihad - whether spiritual, intellectual, or physical - will lead one closer to Allah's pleasure and help.)

O believers! Shall I guide you to a transaction that will save you from a painful punishment? [It is that] you believe in Allah and His Messenger and strive in the cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives. That is best for you, if only you knew. He will forgive you your sins and admit you to gardens beneath which rivers flow... - (Quran 61:10-12).

(These verses describe jihad as a precious deal or bargain with Allah. A believer "trades" their effort and sacrifices in this life, and Allah rewards them with Paradise in the next life. Striving in the cause of Allah with wealth and life - meaning spending in charity, supporting good causes, and if needed, fighting to defend the faith - is presented as something that saves a person from punishment and earns Allah's forgiveness and everlasting bliss. This again emphasizes the great spiritual reward of sincere jihad.)

Indeed, Allah loves those who fight in His cause in [battle] rows as though they are a solid structure. - (Quran 61:4).

(This verse highlights the virtue of unity, discipline, and determination. When Muslims have to fight, they should stand together firmly, like a solid wall. Allah loves the courage and brotherhood of believers who support each other in confronting the enemy. Historically, Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) would straighten the lines of soldiers, emphasizing organization and fairness even in warfare.)

Permission [to fight] has been given to those who are being fought, because they were wronged - and indeed, Allah is most capable of giving them victory. They are those who have been evicted from their homes without right - only because they say, 'Our Lord is Allah.' Had Allah not repelled some people by means of others, monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques - in which the name of Allah is much mentioned - would surely have been destroyed. And Allah will certainly help those who help Him - indeed, Allah is All-Powerful, Almighty. - (Quran 22:39-40).

(These were among the first verses revealed allowing Muslims to fight back after years of persecution. The Quran makes it clear that the reason for this permission is that Muslims were wronged and driven out unjustly for their faith. It also reveals a beautiful principle: by resisting aggressive tyrants, not only mosques but even churches and synagogues and other places of worship are protected. In other words, jihad in Islam isn't to force religion - it's to ensure freedom of religion and protect houses of worship from destruction. This verse shows Islam's tolerance and concern for all religious communities under attack.)

Every one of these Quranic verses adds a piece to the puzzle of jihad's true purpose. We can summarize the Quran's guidance on jihad as follows:

  • No aggression: Muslims are only to fight those who initiate fighting against them or oppress them (2:190). Transgression and injustice are forbidden even during war.
  • Defensive purpose: The main goal is to end persecution and allow people to practice their faith freely (2:193, 22:39-40). War is seen as a means to restore peace and religious freedom, not to impose Islam by force.
  • Fight for justice: Jihad is described as fighting "fi sabilillah" (in the way of Allah), which includes defending the oppressed and establishing justice (4:75).
  • Strict ethics: Even in battle, Islam commands mercy, as seen when the Quran says to cease fighting if the enemy stops aggression (2:192, 2:193) and to protect those who seek peace or asylum (9:6, 8:61). Harming non-combatants is prohibited (we will see more on this in the Hadith section).
  • Sacrifice and reward: Jihad requires personal sacrifice (of wealth, comfort, or life), but Allah promises immense reward and honors those who strive with sincere intentions (4:95, 9:111, 61:11-12).
  • Peace above war: Peace is always preferable if it can be achieved ("If they incline to peace, incline to it also" - 8:61). Islam does not want war for war's sake; it permits war as a last resort to secure peace and protect rights.
  • Strength and unity: The believers are encouraged to be brave and united when jihad becomes necessary (61:4), and not to be lazy or cowardly when injustice must be confronted (9:38-39).

It becomes clear that the Quran's concept of jihad is tied to noble aims: defending faith, life, dignity, and ensuring justice. In fact, one modern scholar, Mahmoud Shaltut (a late Grand Imam of Al-Azhar University), studied all these verses and concluded that Islam's teachings about war reflect "its desire for peace and its aversion against bloodshed and killing for the sake of worldly gains or out of greed.". In other words, Islam only permits fighting to stop oppression and aggression; otherwise, peace is the default state among nations in Islam.

Jihad in the Hadith (Teachings of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ))

To fully grasp jihad, we look not only at the Quran but also at the Hadith, the recorded sayings and actions of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ). The Prophet's teachings and example clarify how these Quranic principles were applied. Below are authentic Hadiths related to jihad, which highlight its virtues, rules, and meaning in practice:

Narrated Abu Musa: A man came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and asked, A man fights for war booty, another fights for fame, and another fights to show off - which of them is fighting in the cause of Allah? The Prophet (ﷺ) said: He who fights so that Allah's Word is supreme is the one fighting in the cause of Allah. - (Sahih al-Bukhari 2810).

(This hadith emphasizes pure intention. Fighting in jihad should only be for the sake of Allah and truth - not for material gain, nationalism, or personal glory. Any other motive does not count as "fi sabilillah" (in Allah's cause).)

Narrated 'Aisha (the wife of the Prophet): She asked the Prophet (ﷺ), O Messenger of Allah, we consider jihad as the best deed. Should we (women) not participate in jihad? He replied: The best jihad for you (women) is an accepted Hajj (pilgrimage). - (Sahih al-Bukhari, Book 52, Hadith 43).

(In this hadith, the Prophet (ﷺ) gently explained that for women (who at that time were generally not obligated to fight), the greatest struggle is a spiritual one - performing the Hajj pilgrimage with sincerity and devotion. This shows that jihad is not solely about battle; it depends on each person's condition. Everyone has their own important struggles in life. For women, the effort, patience, and piety involved in Hajj can equate to the reward of jihad.)

The Prophet (ﷺ) said: The Mujahid is he who struggles against himself (his nafs) in obedience to Allah. - (Sunan al-Tirmidhi 1621, graded Sahih).

(This repeats the idea that inner jihad is crucial. Our greatest enemy can be our own ego or bad desires. Overcoming those is a form of jihad that every believer must continuously engage in.)

The Prophet (ﷺ) said: The best form of jihad is to speak a word of truth in front of an unjust ruler. - (Sunan al-Nasa'i 4209, graded Sahih).

(This hadith, as mentioned earlier, highlights moral courage. Confronting oppression and injustice with truth - even when it's dangerous to do so - is one of the most commendable struggles. It's a non-violent form of jihad but requires tremendous bravery and faith.)

Narrated Sahl bin Sa'd: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, Standing guard for one night in the cause of Allah (ribat) is better than a thousand months of praying and fasting. - (Sunan al-Nasa'i, Sahih).

(Ribat means guarding the frontiers or keeping watch to protect the community. This hadith illustrates the huge spiritual reward for those who put their lives on the line to keep others safe. Even one night of sacrifice and vigilance is better than many years of personal worship. It underlines that protecting the community and its faith is a great act of worship in Islam.)

Narrated Abu Hurairah: The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, Whoever is killed defending his property is a martyr; whoever is killed defending his family is a martyr; whoever is killed defending his religion is a martyr; whoever is killed defending his life is a martyr. - (Sunan Abi Dawud & al-Tirmidhi, Sahih).

(This teaching shows that self-defense and protecting others are legitimate forms of jihad. If a person dies fighting a robber to protect his family or home, or is killed by an oppressor while defending his faith or personal safety, Islam honors that person as a martyr (shahid). It means they died in the path of justice and truth, and they have a high status before Allah. Jihad is not always on a battlefield; it can be any situation where you stand firm to protect what is right, even in daily life.)

The Prophet (ﷺ) said: Whoever dies without having fought or having thought of fighting (for Allah's cause) has died on a branch of hypocrisy. - (Sahih Muslim 1910).

(This hadith might sound strong, but it stresses the importance of the intention and willingness to sacrifice. It doesn't mean every Muslim must actually fight. Rather, it means if one never even intends or is willing to defend the truth and protect the innocent when necessary, there is something lacking in their faith. A sincere believer hopes that if ever duty calls, they would step up for jihad for Allah's sake. Living a life completely indifferent to the struggles of the ummah (community) and justice - as if one would never lift a finger even if others were being hurt - is compared to hypocrisy. True faith includes the readiness to sacrifice for righteousness, even if one never faces that situation.)

Narrated Abdullah ibn Amr: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, Whoever is killed while defending his property is a martyr. - (Sahih al-Bukhari 2480, Sahih Muslim 141).

(A shorter version of the earlier concept, emphasizing that even fighting off thieves or aggressors in personal life - and dying in the process - earns the status of a martyr. Islam considers it a noble death because you died standing against wrongdoing.)

Narrated Anas ibn Malik: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, No one who dies and enters Paradise would ever want to come back to this world - even if he could have everything on earth - except for the martyr. The martyr would wish to return to the world and be killed ten more times for the honor and reward he receives (in Paradise). - (Sahih Muslim 1877).

(This hadith highlights the immense honor given to those who die in true jihad (martyrs). It paints a picture: Paradise is so wonderful that souls don't want to leave, but a martyr, after seeing the special rewards and rank Allah has given him, would be willing to go back and sacrifice again ten times over! This emphasizes that martyrdom in Islam is not seen as a tragedy but as a high honor - provided the person died fighting in the cause of Allah (justice, truth, defense of faith).)

Narrated Abu Musa: A Bedouin asked the Prophet (ﷺ), O Messenger of Allah, what is fighting in Allah's cause? For some of us fight because of anger or for tribal honor. The Prophet replied: The one who fights so that the word of Allah is the highest is the one fighting in Allah's cause. - (Sahih al-Bukhari & Sahih Muslim).

(This is similar in meaning to the earlier hadith from Abu Musa. The Prophet (ﷺ) made it absolutely clear that only fighting fee sabeelillah (for Allah's cause) counts as jihad. Personal grudges, vengeance, nationalism, or other worldly motives cannot be labeled "jihad." This point is critical: intention transforms a fight from mere violence into an act of worship. Muslim scholars derived from this that a valid jihad must have righteous intentions and be authorized for righteous causes, not just any fight or war.)

During a battle, the Prophet (ﷺ) saw a woman's body on the battlefield and said, "She was not fighting." He then forbade the killing of women and children. - (Sahih Muslim 1744).

(In this incident, after the Battle of Hunayn, the Prophet (ﷺ) found that a woman from the enemy side had been killed. He was visibly upset because she was not a combatant. He then strictly forbade the army from ever targeting women or children. This becomes a foundational rule in Islamic law: non-combatants are not to be harmed. Later jurists included in this category old people, monks, peasants not involved in fighting, and other civilians. This prophetic command shows the mercy and restraint in jihad. Over 1400 years ago, long before modern Geneva Conventions, Islam established rules of ethical warfare.)

It is narrated that Abu Bakr al-Siddiq (the first Caliph) would advise his army: Do not betray or commit treachery. Do not kill any women, child, or elderly. Do not cut down fruit-bearing trees or destroy crops. Do not slaughter sheep, cows, or camels except for food. You will come across monks in monasteries; leave them and do not harm them... - (Recorded in al-Muwatta' of Imam Malik).

(This is not a hadith of the Prophet, but the instructions of his closest companion and successor, Abu Bakr, to the Muslim army heading to Syria. It beautifully echoes the Prophet's teachings and shows how the early Muslims conducted jihad with discipline and ethics. They were told explicitly not to harm innocents, not to ruin the land or animals unnecessarily, and to even leave hermits and monks in peace. Such guidelines highlight that jihad was never a license for brutality - it was a just war concept with a strong moral code. Historical records show that Muslim commanders, like Salahuddin (Saladin) centuries later, often instructed their troops similarly.)

These hadiths confirm and elaborate on what we learned from the Quran:

  • Intentions must be pure: Fighting must be for the sake of Allah's justice alone, otherwise it's not true jihad.
  • Different forms of jihad: The Prophet (ﷺ) emphasized the greater jihad of self-control and the jihad of speaking truth. Not all jihad is fighting; armed jihad is just one aspect under specific conditions.
  • Great reward for sacrifice: The status of martyrs and those who strive is extremely high. They are promised forgiveness and honor in the hereafter.
  • No harm to innocents: He forbade killing women, children, and other non-combatants. This established the principle of distinction between combatants and civilians - a concept very advanced for its time and still central to modern rules of engagement.
  • No abuse or excess: The early Caliphs reinforced that Muslims must not commit injustices during war - no treachery, no mutilation of bodies, no destruction beyond necessity. Kindness to prisoners and keeping one's word were also strongly emphasized in other narrations.
  • Jihad as defense: Many hadiths show jihad as defending life, property, family, and religion. Dying in defense is as honorable as dying on a formal battlefield for a state. This again ties jihad to the concept of fighting oppression and aggression, not initiating violence.

In summary, the Hadith paints jihad as a balanced, principled endeavor. It's about courage and selflessness on one hand, and mercy and restraint on the other. As Muslims, we look up to figures like Ali ibn Abi Talib (the Prophet's cousin) who in battle, according to history, spared an enemy's life because the enemy spit on him, Ali feared that if he killed him in anger, it would not be purely for Allah anymore. Such stories illustrate how seriously the companions took the ethics of jihad and sincerity of intention.

Jihad in Fiqh (Islamic Law)

The term fiqh refers to Islamic jurisprudence, the understanding of shariah (Islamic law) by scholars. Over centuries, Muslim jurists studied the Quran and Hadith on jihad (like those we saw) and formulated legal guidelines for when and how jihad (particularly armed jihad) can be conducted. In fiqh, jihad primarily refers to lawful warfare for the sake of Allah, under specific conditions. Key points of jihad in Islamic law include the following:

Types of Jihad and Obligation

Scholars generally categorized jihad into different levels and types:

  • Jihad al-nafs (jihad against one's self): the personal struggle against sin. This is considered an individual obligation at all times - every Muslim must do this jihad to purify their heart and actions.
  • Jihad by knowledge and words: spreading the message of Islam, teaching, enjoining good and forbidding wrong. This too is an obligation, though it can be fulfilled collectively (not every single person must be a scholar or public speaker, but the community must not neglect it).
  • Jihad by wealth: funding and supporting good causes, helping the poor, or financing the defense of the community. The Quran often pairs "strive with your wealth and your lives" - so giving charity for the cause of Allah is a form of jihad.
  • Jihad by the sword (combat): physical fighting against aggressors or oppressors. This is what is usually meant by jihad in the context of Islamic law books.

In Islamic jurisprudence, armed jihad is generally considered a collective obligation (fard kifayah). This means that if a sufficient number of people in the community participate in it, the duty is fulfilled on behalf of all. Not every single Muslim is required to go to battle. For example, if the country is safe and well-defended by its army, other citizens don't have to enlist. However, if no one fulfills the duty when it is needed, then everyone is sinful for neglecting it.

There are certain situations where jihad becomes a fard 'ayn (individual duty). Classical scholars mentioned these cases:

  • Defense of the homeland: If an enemy attacks a Muslim land, then defending one's home becomes an individual duty for those under attack. Every able person must fight to defend their family and land, similar to how any nation expects its citizens to defend against invasion.
  • When the Imam (leader) calls upon the people directly: In early times, if the legitimate Caliph or ruler declared a general mobilization for jihad because it was necessary, then those called upon had to respond (unless they had a valid excuse like illness). The ruler was expected to be responsible in such calls - only when needed.
  • When one is physically present at the battlefront: If combat suddenly occurs or one is in a location under attack, that person must fight back because they are directly involved - they can't walk away saying "others will handle it."

Apart from these scenarios, armed jihad campaigns (especially offensive expeditions) were usually undertaken by a section of the community (such as a professional army or volunteers), not by dragging every citizen into war.

Importantly, Islamic law forbids vigilantism or "freelance" jihad. Jihad is not a personal endeavor that anyone can declare on their own. It must be under the leadership of the Muslim ruler or state authority. The Prophet (ﷺ) and his successors in Madinah were heads of state; they organized and declared jihad centrally. Classical scholars insist that only a legitimate leader can announce offensive jihad, so that it's done with order and justice. This prevents chaos and misuse of the concept. Sadly, in modern times, extremist groups calling themselves "jihadis" often ignore this principle and take up arms without legitimate authority or just cause, something fundamentally against the classical fiqh of jihad.

Rules and Ethics of Jihad

Islamic fiqh places heavy emphasis on rules of engagement. The Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), as we saw, set strict guidelines which became the basis of Islamic military ethics. Some of the core rules include:

  • No killing of non-combatants: Women, children, the elderly, sick, monks and hermits not participating in fighting, and other civilians are not to be targeted. The Prophet's explicit forbiddance of this is recorded, and scholars from all schools unanimously upheld this rule - harming innocents is a grave sin, not a virtue.
  • No torture or mutilation: The Prophet (ﷺ) forbade mutilating the bodies of enemies. Also, prisoners of war must be treated humanely. Historical reports mention how Islamic commanders were to give water to the captives, feed them, and not harm them. For instance, after one battle, the Prophet (ﷺ) distributed captives among his companions and told them, "Treat them well." Many prisoners of war later testified that the Muslims gave them better food than they ate themselves. This compassionate treatment often led prisoners to understand Islam and even embrace it voluntarily.
  • No treachery and uphold treaties: Islam commands honoring agreements. If there was a truce or peace treaty (hudna), Muslims are bound by it. The Quran in Surah 9 rebuked the pagans of Mecca for breaking their treaty, and only then allowed fighting them. The Prophet (ﷺ) said: "Whoever kills a person who has a truce with the Muslims will never smell the fragrance of Paradise." - meaning it's a major sin to harm those with whom you have an agreement of peace.
  • Proportionality and necessity: Wanton destruction is prohibited. As Abu Bakr's instructions exemplified, Muslims should not destroy orchards, crops, or infrastructure except if necessary for military purposes. They shouldn't kill livestock except for food. This shows a concern for the environment and civilian resources - very much like today's concept of avoiding collateral damage. Muslims are to use only the force necessary to achieve legitimate aims.
  • Call to Islam or terms of peace first: In many historical accounts, Muslim armies were instructed to present the enemy with options before engagement: (1) embrace Islam (and become part of the Muslim community, after which there's no conflict), or (2) if not, then at least cease hostility and agree to live under Muslim protection with a tax (jizya), or (3) if both options are refused, then fight. While this was a practice during the expansions, its spirit was that war was not the first resort. The enemy was given a chance to avoid war by either accepting Islam or entering a peace agreement. If they chose to fight, only then war occurred.
  • No compulsion in religion: The Quran clearly states, "There is no compulsion in religion" (2:256). Forcing someone to convert to Islam under threat is forbidden. The purpose of jihad was never to force conversion - it was to remove obstacles to the free worship of Allah. When the Quran mentions fighting people "until they testify none is worthy of worship except Allah" in hadith or until "religion is for Allah" in Quran, it is understood in context as removing oppressive systems that prevent people from freely choosing Islam, rather than forcing individuals to convert at sword-point. Historically, vast populations in conquered lands remained non-Muslim (Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians, Hindus, etc.) for centuries, living under Muslim rule, which shows that forced conversion was not Islamic policy.
  • Jizya (protective tax): In classical Islamic law, jizya was a tax on non-Muslim subjects (usually able-bodied men of military age) in exchange for the state's protection and exemption from military service. If a non-Muslim people agreed to pay jizya, they became dhimmi (protected people) and were not to be fought. They kept their religion, and the Muslim army then defended them as it would defend its own. This was essentially a diplomacy tool to avoid conflict - instead of fighting, a pact is made. Some Islamic schools (like the Hanafis) even allowed offering this status to polytheists, not only "People of the Book," in order to prevent bloodshed and expand peaceful relations. The existence of jizya is actually a mercy in that context: it gave an option other than war, and it recognized religious pluralism. The jizya tax itself was often modest and lighter than the zakat taxes Muslims paid. And if a non-Muslim people under Muslim rule were attacked by an outside force, the Muslim army protected them; if the state couldn't defend them, it would even return the jizya to them. This actually happened in history (e.g., during the Muslim withdrawal from some areas against the Crusaders, refunds of jizya were given because the Muslims could no longer assure protection).

In summary, fiqh ensured jihad remained just and purposeful. One famed Islamic scholar, Imam Ibn al-Qayyim, wrote that jihad in Islam goes through stages and is governed by context: patience under persecution, permission to defend, fighting those who fight you, and finally, removing aggressive powers entirely so that peace prevails. But he and others never intended this to mean indiscriminate violence. They outlined categories of enemy (combatant vs. non-combatant) and stressed fulfilling covenants.

It's worth noting that many principles of modern international law regarding war (like not targeting civilians or avoiding unnecessary destruction) were present in Islamic law over a millennium earlier. The Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) and his companions practiced a level of battlefield ethics that was revolutionary in their era. This is a point of pride and faith for Muslims: we believe these merciful rules come from divine guidance and the exemplary character of Allah's Messenger who was, as the Quran says, "a mercy to all the worlds."

The Four Sunni Schools of Thought

Sunni Islam has four major fiqh schools (madhhabs): Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali. When it comes to jihad, all four schools agree on the basic teachings we've discussed, because these are clearly based on Quran and Hadith. There are no fundamental differences among them on the justification of jihad or its main objectives. However, they did have some minor differences in interpretation and implementation details:

  • Hanafi: The Hanafis generally held that jihad (referring to armed struggle) is a communal obligation. One interesting Hanafi view is that they allowed making truces and peace treaties for up to 10 years (renewable) and even beyond, based on the Prophet's Treaty of Hudaybiyyah (which was ten years) as a model. They also were more flexible in accepting jizya from various groups. For example, classical Hanafis allowed offering jizya status to idolaters (not just People of the Book) to avoid conflict, referencing how the Prophet (ﷺ) took jizya from Zoroastrians of Persia.
  • Maliki: Maliki jurists (prevalent in West Africa and historically in parts of Arabia and Spain) likewise saw jihad as generally a communal duty. They emphasized the idea of "maslahah" (public interest) in decisions about war and peace - meaning the leader should consider the overall benefit or harm to the Muslim community before engaging in jihad. Malikis, like others, upheld rules protecting civilians. They also discussed in detail the treatment of prisoners and the division of war gains, as all schools did.
  • Shafi'i: The Shafi'i school, while agreeing on principles, tended to be more strict in some classical rulings. For instance, some Shafi'i jurists, citing certain interpretations, said jizya should only be accepted from People of the Book (Christians, Jews, and similar religions) and Zoroastrians, but not from idolaters in Arabia - they based this on specific prophetic sayings. Historically, though, these situations rarely arose as Islam spread and context changed. Shafi'is also pressed that jihad must be under legitimate leadership - an important point we noted.
  • Hanbali: The Hanbali school (from which later emerged scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah) also agreed on the general framework. They strongly emphasized following the Prophet's example in war ethics. Ibn Taymiyyah, for example, wrote letters forbidding the killing of non-combatants, even in the heat of conflict during events like the Mongol invasions. Hanbalis also allowed defensive alliances with non-Muslims if needed to fight a common enemy (something the Prophet (ﷺ) also did when he made alliances with some pagan tribes against other threatening forces).

In practice, these differences rarely led to starkly different outcomes; they were more about nuances:

  • The conditions and length of truces with hostile powers.
  • Exactly which groups are eligible to be "dhimmi" (protected non-Muslim citizens paying jizya).
  • Technicalities of how spoils of war are handled or how invitations to Islam are given before battle.
  • Details on prisoner of war treatment (though generally all allowed options of mercy: release, ransom, or integrating prisoners, especially if they accepted Islam).

All schools agree that unjustified violence is haram (forbidden). They agree that terrorism (the killing of innocent people) is not jihad at all, but rather a grave sin. They agree that jihad is not "holy war" in the sense of what we might call a crusade, but a type of just war, with the aim of establishing peace and justice.

It's heartening to observe that classical scholars often wrote about compassion in jihad. For example, Imam al-Nawawi (a great Shafi'i scholar) stated that even in battle, if the enemy soldier is captured or surrenders, it is not allowed to kill him. Once the threat is neutralized, the opportunity for mercy is preferred. Many jurists also said Muslims should always seek peace if the enemy inclines towards it, citing the Quran 8:61, and that treachery is never allowed, if the enemy breaks a treaty that's on them, but Muslims should not be the ones to betray.

Historical Context and Examples

Understanding jihad also requires a bit of historical context. In the early 7th century Arabia, when Islam emerged, the world was a very hostile place for the small community of believers. Muslims in Mecca faced torture, boycotts, and even attempts on the Prophet's life. Through the Meccan period (610-622 CE), Muslims were forbidden to fight back. Their jihad was purely patience and preaching. Many were martyred without retaliation.

After the migration to Madinah (622 CE), Muslims formed a small state. Even then, the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) did not initiate fighting against the Meccans until after the Meccans launched military campaigns to destroy the Muslim community (like the Battle of Badr in 624 CE). The Battle of Badr was the first major armed jihad for Muslims, and it was purely defensive. The Muslims (just ~313 in number) faced a well-armed Meccan force three times their size. Miraculously, the Muslims won that battle, which they saw as a sign of Allah's support (the Quran even mentions that angels were sent to assist the believers in Badr). This victory was a turning point, it proved that standing up to oppression with faith and courage, even against great odds, can succeed by God's will.

Over the next few years, more battles followed: Uhud, Khandaq (the Trench), etc., all of which were responses to Meccan aggression. The Muslims' posture was essentially defensive until the truce of Hudaybiyyah (628 CE) and eventually the peaceful opening of Mecca (630 CE) when the Prophet (ﷺ) returned to his hometown with an army yet largely avoided bloodshed, he forgave his former enemies almost universally upon entry to Mecca.

The verses of Surah al-Tawbah (Chapter 9 of the Quran) that we listed earlier came around 631 CE, when, after years of treaties and truces, some pagan tribes broke their pacts and attacked. Those verses instructed the Prophet (ﷺ) to respond firmly to that final betrayal and put an end to organized hostility in Arabia. After that, Arabia became unified under Islam without opponents constantly threatening the community.

Following the Prophet's death (632 CE), the early Caliphates (Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali) engaged in what they saw as both defensive and expansionary jihad. The Byzantine and Persian Empires, which were superpowers, had shown aggression on the borders and sometimes within (the Byzantines, for instance, persecuted Arab tribes). The Muslims, under Caliph Abu Bakr and then Umar, launched campaigns into the Byzantine territories in Syria and the Persian Sassanid Empire. This was partly pre-emptive (those empires might have crushed the new Muslim state if it remained weak) and partly to liberate people under tyrannical rule (some Christian sects welcomed Muslim rule since the Byzantines had been harsh towards them due to doctrinal differences).

These conquests were rapid and surprisingly successful, which Muslims believe was by Allah's help. But importantly, wherever they went, the Muslims offered terms of peace, and when cities surrendered, the inhabitants were generally allowed to continue their lives, keep their property and religion, under the protection of Islamic law. There are famous historical covenants, like the Covenant of Umar for Jerusalem, where the Caliph Umar in 637 CE assured the people of Jerusalem (mostly Christians and Jews) safety, freedom of worship, and that their churches and synagogues would not be taken or destroyed. Such treatment was often far more tolerant than what previous empires offered. This led many populations to gradually embrace Islam over generations, not by force but by seeing the justice and simplicity of Islamic rule.

Of course, history is complex and not every battle or policy of later Muslim rulers remained ideal. There were instances of overzealousness or political fights that had nothing to do with Islamic ideals. But by and large, the concept of jihad as regulated in fiqh acted as a check on Muslim conduct. It's telling that across centuries, scholars kept writing about jihad with the same principles of justice and mercy, often advising or rebuking rulers if they overstepped.

One example of historical jihad often cited is Salahuddin Ayyubi (Saladin) in the 12th century. He fought the Crusaders to reclaim Jerusalem. His conduct during that war is remembered for chivalry, he forbade harming civilians, treated enemy prisoners with kindness (even famously sending his Crusader opponents medicine when they were ill), and when he took Jerusalem back after battle, he did not do a massacre (in contrast to when Crusaders took it earlier). This kind of behavior was deeply rooted in Islamic values from Quran and Hadith. It impressed even his Christian adversaries.

Another example: During the Mongol invasions of the 13th century, scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah participated in jihad to defend Muslim lands. Yet Ibn Taymiyyah wrote letters to the Mongol king reminding him that Islam does not allow killing innocents and that even in war, one must distinguish combatants. He was calling out the Mongols, who had by then accepted Islam but were not following Islamic rules properly. This shows how scholars viewed themselves as guardians of the ethics of jihad, not only cheerleaders for warfare.

The Purpose and Relevance of Jihad Today

For us as Muslims today, understanding jihad correctly is very important. We live in a time where the concept of jihad is often misunderstood by non-Muslims and sadly even misused by some Muslims. To clarify:

  • Jihad is not "holy war" in the sense of unprovoked violence. Islam does not endorse terrorism or killing innocents - those acts directly violate the teachings we have seen. Groups that commit such atrocities and call it jihad are doing grave injustice to the term and violating Islam's clear commands. Mainstream Muslim scholars worldwide have condemned such acts as haram (forbidden) and not legitimate jihad.
  • Jihad is a mercy, not a cruelty. It's about defending what is right. Think of jihad as similar to the concept of a "just war" in Western philosophy - war that is waged for just causes under strict conditions. In fact, jihad basically outlines one of the earliest frameworks of just war theory. It's fought to protect people, not to harm, and it must stop when its objectives are met.
  • In today's context, a lot of jihad for most Muslims is the peaceful struggle: the struggle to be good, honest, compassionate individuals. It's the struggle to educate others about Islam through wisdom and good example (a form of dawah). It's also the struggle to improve our communities, fight poverty, defend the rights of the weak and oppressed, and stand up against injustice in our societies. For instance, speaking out against corruption, helping those in need, or campaigning for social justice - these can all be forms of jihad when done for the sake of Allah's principles.
  • Armed jihad in modern times is a delicate topic because the world is organized into nation-states and we have international laws. The general Islamic principle remains: if a land is occupied or people are oppressed violently, they have the right to defend themselves. That defensive fighting is jihad. This would apply, for example, where people's homes are invaded and their rights denied - striving to repel that is considered a just jihad. However, even in such cases, all the ethical rules apply: no targeting civilians, no transgression, and only fighting as a last resort. Modern Muslim scholars often emphasize that any declaration of armed jihad must come from legitimate government authorities or a consensus of qualified scholars, and must observe international treaties and norms that do not conflict with Islamic principles.

In essence, as much as possible, disputes should be settled peacefully. Dialogue, treaties, and legal means are preferred. Jihad with weapons is only a final measure when oppression cannot be stopped by other means. The best jihad today for most of us is the jihad of education, morality, and community building.

Jihad vs. Other Worldviews

It's worthwhile to compare Islam's view on fighting with alternatives:

  • Pacifism: Some philosophies or religions promote absolute non-violence (never take up arms). Islam is not pacifist - it recognizes that in a world where evil people use force, sometimes force is needed to resist them. If Muslims were absolute pacifists in Medina, they would have been wiped out by the Meccan army, and the weak in Arabia would have remained under oppressive regimes. Jihad provided a means to establish justice and freedom of belief. However, Islam also does not glorify war. It strikes a balance: Fight when you must, but never exceed limits or fight for worldly gain. As one scholar said, "Islam calls for peace, but not at the cost of cowardice; it permits fighting, but not for the sake of tyranny."
  • Total war or militarism: On the opposite end, some ideologies glorify conquest or racial superiority and engage in unrestrained warfare. History has seen many brutal conquests and world wars with terrible civilian casualties. Islamic jihad is far from that. It puts spirituality and ethics at the core of conflict. Victory in Islam is not merely judged by land gained, but by holding to moral conduct. A hadith says when returning from battle, "We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad," referring to battling the self. This narrations (though from later sources) encapsulates a truth: the real victory is adhering to righteousness, not how many enemies slain.

One could argue that the Islamic rules of jihad, if followed, result in less destruction and quicker peace than the all-out wars seen in other contexts. For example, Muslims are forbidden to destroy infrastructure needed for people's livelihood; contrast this with the "scorched earth" tactics often used in other wars historically. Muslims were taught to stop fighting when the enemy yields; in many historical European wars, even a surrendering city could be sacked and its people massacred. So Islam introduced a humanitarian aspect to warfare that was ahead of its time.

From a theological perspective, we Muslims also believe that jihad (both inner and outer) is a means of purification and growth. It's an opportunity to show obedience to Allah and to prefer higher ideals over one's own comfort. Without jihad, a person or community might become selfish or complacent. The challenges of jihad, controlling one's anger, facing one's fears, sacrificing wealth, risking life, all these develop qualities of patience, reliance on Allah, courage, and generosity. That is part of the beauty of jihad as a spiritual concept. It knits the community together in solidarity and it elevates the soul of the individual who engages in it with sincerity.

Conclusion

Jihad in Islam is a multifaceted concept of striving for good. It includes striving against our inner evils, speaking out for justice, helping others, and yes, defending the community when under threat. In the realm of Islamic law (fiqh), jihad primarily refers to just warfare, but as we have seen, it is a warfare bound by strict moral and spiritual guidelines. Its purpose is never to spread chaos or compel religion by force, but to establish justice and protect the innocent.

For Muslims today, the lessons of jihad are highly relevant. We learn that:

  • We must always check our intentions: Are we doing something truly for Allah's sake (to uphold truth and compassion) or for ego and anger? This applies whether one is debating someone online, participating in a protest, or even just giving charity. The spirit of jihad demands sincerity.
  • We are encouraged to be people of courage and action, not passivity. If we see wrongdoing - whether in our own soul or in society - we should strive to change it for the better. This could be by our heart (hating the wrong), by our tongue (speaking out), or by our hand (taking action), as another famous hadith teaches. Indifference is not an option; that is a form of hypocrisy, as the Prophet (ﷺ) warned in the hadith about never even intending to struggle.
  • We must also be people of mercy and restraint. Islam wants us to be just even towards our enemies. The Quran says: "Do not let hatred of a people lead you to injustice. Be just; that is closer to piety." (Quran 5:8). So, whether it's war or peace, a Muslim is commanded to be just and kind. If ever a fight is thrust upon us, we do not lose our morality. We see many examples of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) forgiving enemies (like he forgave the Quraysh of Mecca, saying "No retribution on this day"). That forgiving, humane attitude is what we aim to carry forward.
  • In modern times, actual combat jihad is rare for most Muslims, as many live in peaceful countries. Our jihad might be political engagement, community service, spreading knowledge, or fighting poverty and ignorance. For instance, a Muslim doctor serving in a free clinic in a poor area can view her work as a form of jihad - striving in Allah's cause to save lives and alleviate suffering. A student resisting peer pressure to do immoral things is doing jihad. Parents working hard to raise moral, educated children are in a jihad of their own. Recognizing these everyday struggles as jihad gives them a noble dimension and reminds us that Allah rewards all sincere effort.
  • When it comes to misconceptions, we Muslims have a duty (a jihad of the pen and tongue) to clarify what jihad truly means to our non-Muslim neighbors. This is part of dawah (inviting to Islam) - explaining that Islam is not a religion of violence, but one of balance. Yes, it permits fighting for just causes, but with compassion. We can proudly share how Islamic rules protected civilians long before modern laws, or how our Prophet (ﷺ) showed mercy even to those who fought him. This educational effort is crucial in a time when terms like "jihad" are often maligned.

In conclusion, the concept of jihad in fiqh embodies some of the highest values of Islam: commitment to truth, willingness to sacrifice, defense of the vulnerable, and adherence to ethical standards. It is through this lens that Muslims see jihad as something positive and praiseworthy, not something to be ashamed of. The world has many problems (oppression, injustice, moral decay) and jihad, in its true sense, is the God-sanctioned effort to combat those problems on all fronts, within ourselves and in society.

As Muslims, we ask Allah to guide us to carry out the jihad He loves: striving with wisdom, patience, and courage to make this world a better place, while never violating His bounds of justice and mercy. In doing so, we follow the example of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) and his companions, who showed us how to live a life of meaningful struggle. May Allah accept our efforts (no matter how small) as jihad in His cause, and may He grant us the ultimate success in this life and the hereafter. Ameen.


In summary, jihad is about striving for the good with all our might. It's a cornerstone that encourages Muslims to be proactive, resilient, and principled. Whether it is fighting one's ego, feeding the poor, or (if absolutely necessary) fighting tyranny on the battlefield, it's all part of the beautiful fabric of jihad. By understanding this concept in its fullness, we as Muslims can practice our faith more holistically and show the world the true, peaceful, and principled spirit of Islam.

Sources

# Source
1 Islam Question & Answer (Fatwa No. 20214). "Ruling on Jihad and kinds of Jihad" - Detailed scholarly answer outlining the types of jihad (against the self, Satan, disbelievers, and hypocrites) and clarifying the communal vs. individual obligations of armed jihad.
2 Abdullah Yusuf Ali (Commentary in The Holy Qur'an). Note on Quran 2:190-193 - Explains that war in Islam is only permitted in self-defense and to fight oppression, never for aggression. Emphasizes the Quran's limits on warfare and the principle "Allah loves not transgressors."
3 Mahmoud Shaltut (Grand Imam of Al-Azhar). "The Quran and Combat" - A treatise concluding that Islam's stance on war makes peace the norm and fighting only to uphold justice. Shaltut argues many so-called "war verses" were misinterpreted and that the Quran's true intent is a strong aversion to war and bloodshed except when absolutely necessary.
4 Abu Bakr's Ten Commandments of War - Recorded in Imam Malik's Al-Muwatta'. Abu Bakr (RA) instructed Muslim armies not to kill women, children, or the elderly, nor destroy crops or trees, reflecting a consensus among early Muslims on ethical warfare. Muslim scholars like Imam Ibn Abd al-Barr noted a unanimous agreement that harming non-combatants is forbidden.
5 Yusuf al-Qaradawi - "Fiqh al-Jihad" (2009). A comprehensive 2-volume modern work by a renowned scholar, analyzing jihad in the Quran and Sunnah and addressing contemporary misunderstandings. It covers the defensive nature of jihad, its conditions, and refutes extremist interpretations.
6 Ibn Rushd (Averroes) - "Bidayat al-Mujtahid" (12th century). A classical manual of Islamic law which includes a chapter comparing the views of major jurists on jihad. Provides insight into how the Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali schools concurred on jihad's principles with slight differences in application.
7 Mahmoud Muhammad Shaltut - "Al-Quran wal-Qital" (The Quran and Fighting) (1948). This book (translated in Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam, ed. Rudolph Peters) articulates the mainstream scholarly view that Islam's default state is peace. Shaltut explains that jihad was legislated to end persecution, never to force faith, and he rejects the claims of abrogation of peaceful verses.
8 Abul A'la Maududi - "Jihad in Islam" (English edition, 1930s). A popular treatise by an influential 20th-century Islamic thinker. Maududi describes jihad as a revolutionary struggle against tyranny and evil, not just through arms but through all possible means. He clarifies that Islam doesn't seek to compel religion but to establish a just social order.
9 Majid Khadduri - "War and Peace in the Law of Islam" (1955). An academic study of the Islamic laws of war, peace treaties, and jihad. Khadduri explains historical practice of jihad and how Islamic principles of warfare compare to Western just war theory. A widely-referenced book for understanding jihad in historical context.
10 Salman al-Ouda - "Guidelines for Jihad" (Arabic, 2008). A contemporary scholarly paper outlining the conditions and ethics of jihad. Al-Ouda, a well-known Saudi scholar, emphasizes that any legitimate jihad must have righteous cause, right authority, and must spare civilians. It refutes modern extremist misuses of the term and reasserts classical conditions.

: Ibn al-Qayyim, as cited in Islam Q&A, describes four kinds of jihad and notes that fighting unbelievers is usually fard kifayah (communal duty), becoming fard 'ayn only in special cases. All Sunni scholars agree that jihad with arms must be led by a legitimate authority and is subject to conditions of capability and justice. : Muhammad Asad, in his Quran commentary, underscores that every Quranic reference to fighting is restricted to self-defense and combating oppression. The earliest verse permitting fighting (22:39) sets the tone: Muslims fight because they have been wronged, a principle maintained throughout the Quran's revelations on jihad. : Prof. Rudolph Peters notes that Shaltut's view (peace is the norm, war is an exception) represents "the vast majority of mainstream Islamic scholarship". This approach rejects the misinterpretation that later "sword verses" canceled out all peaceful verses. Instead, all verses are taken in context: Islam promotes peace first, and allows fighting only to remove tyranny and secure justice. : The consensus on protecting non-combatants is well documented. Imam al-Nawawi in Sharh Sahih Muslim wrote: "Scholars are unanimous that it is prohibited to kill women and children in war, unless they fight." Classical jurist Abu Yusuf (Hanafi) wrote in Kitab al-Kharaj that harming farmers, traders, and monks is not allowed as they are non-combatants. Abu Bakr's famous instructions and similar orders by later caliphs show this was the practiced policy of the Muslim army.