The Quran is a text that invites its readers to ponder deeply about the nature of existence. One of the profound arguments it presents is found in Surah At-Tur, verses 35-36, which challenge us to consider the origins of creation. Muslim theologians and philosophers have often drawn on this verse as a powerful Quranic prompt for rational reflection, though their later arguments took different technical forms and should not all be treated as a single identical proof. It engages with the fundamental question of whether the universe and everything within it could have emerged without a cause, whether it could have caused itself, or whether it must have been caused by something beyond itself.
The Quranic Argument
"Were they created by nothing, or were they the creators [of themselves]? Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Rather, they are not certain." (Quran 52:35-36)
These verses press the reader through a set of impossible alternatives: were human beings brought into existence with no creator at all; did they create themselves; or do they possess creative power over the heavens and the earth? Classical tafsir commonly explains "min ghayri shay'" here as "without a creator" or "without any originating cause," not as a technical claim that creatures were made out of a material called "nothing." The force of the verse is that non-existence does not produce existence, and a thing cannot be the author of its own existence before it exists. The remaining conclusion is that contingent beings point beyond themselves to the Creator.
Classical Development of the Argument
Classical Muslim theologians, known as mutakallimun, developed arguments for huduth: that the world is originated and therefore dependent on an Originator. In broad terms, they argued from features such as change, composition, temporality, and dependence to the need for a Creator who is not Himself originated. This family of arguments is what later writers often call the "kalam cosmological argument," commonly summarized as: whatever begins to exist has a cause; the universe began to exist; therefore the universe has a cause.
Ibn Sina (Avicenna) developed a related but distinct contingency argument. His proof does not depend primarily on proving a temporal beginning of the universe; rather, it argues that contingent realities, whose existence is possible rather than necessary, require an ultimate Necessary Existent. Sunni theologians benefited from some of this language while also critiquing aspects of Ibn Sina's wider metaphysical system. Thus, the Quranic verse, kalam huduth arguments, and Avicennan contingency arguments all converge on dependence upon Allah, while remaining philosophically distinct.
Engaging with Serious Replies
Critics of these arguments sometimes propose that the universe as a whole might not require a cause or explanation in the same way that individual things within it do. On this view, the universe may simply be a "brute fact." This is a serious philosophical reply, not a mere evasion. The Muslim response is that making the totality of contingent things into a brute fact is a very costly move: if each dependent part calls for explanation, merely collecting the parts together does not obviously make the whole necessary or self-explanatory. The debate here often turns on how strongly one accepts a principle of sufficient reason: that contingent realities are intelligible and require an explanation beyond themselves.
Another reply appeals to quantum mechanics, where causality is more subtle than in everyday experience. This point should not be overstated. Quantum events, as described by physics, still occur within a physical order governed by laws, fields, states, and mathematical structures; a "quantum vacuum" is not absolute philosophical nothingness. Even if some events are indeterministic, that would not show that absolute nothing can produce something, nor would it explain why there is any physical order at all. The Quranic and kalam question is deeper than a gap in current physics: why does any contingent reality exist rather than not exist?
Reason and Faith
The Quranic argument in Surah At-Tur appeals to both reason and faith. For those who may not yet accept the Quran as revelation, the verse still invites reflection on existence, dependence, and causality. It is not presented as a slogan that bypasses all philosophical debate, but as a concise challenge to assumptions many people rarely examine: can the contingent explain itself, can nothing produce something, or is a necessary Creator the most coherent explanation?
Other Quranic verses broaden this theme by pointing to Allah's originating command and to the ordered signs within the heavens, the earth, and living things:
"The Originator of the heavens and the earth. When He decrees a matter, He only says to it, 'Be,' and it is." (Quran 2:117)
"Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?" (Quran 21:30)
Quran 2:117 clearly teaches Allah's originating power: He creates by His command and is not dependent on pre-existing causes. Quran 21:30 presents the heavens, the earth, and life from water as signs that should awaken reflection. It should not be overstated as a detailed modern cosmological prediction; classical commentators discussed the verse in terms of the heavens and earth being joined or closed and then separated or opened by Allah's power. Its main da'wah point is that the order and life we observe are signs of the Creator, not self-sufficient realities.
Conclusion
In exploring the Quranic argument of creation, we find a powerful intersection of faith and reason. The challenge posed in Surah At-Tur encourages deep reflection on the origins of existence, inviting believers and skeptics alike to engage with one of life's most profound questions. It does not pretend that every philosophical objection can be dismissed in a sentence, but it does expose the difficulty of explaining contingent existence without a necessary Creator. For the Quran, this is not abstract speculation alone; it is a call to recognize Allah, the Originator of the heavens and the earth, with humility and certainty.