Defending Islam
Can You Be Intimate with Slaves?

Understanding Slavery and Intimacy in Islam: Unpacking a Sensitive Topic
- Understanding Slavery and Intimacy in Islam: Unpacking a Sensitive Topic
- Introduction
- Islamic vs. Western Slavery: Key Differences
- Slavery in Islamic History: A Brief Overview
- Quranic Verses on Slavery and Concubinage
- Hadith: The Prophet’s Teachings on Slavery and Concubines
- The Wisdom Behind Allowing Concubinage
- Why Islam’s Perspective Is the Best (Comparative Insights)
- Views of Scholars: Classical and Contemporary
- A Miraculous Social Transformation
- Modern Muslims and the Legacy of Slavery
- Islam’s Role in the Abolition of Slavery
- Conclusion
- Recommended Books
Introduction
Slavery existed throughout human history, from ancient empires to early Islamic societies. However, Islam took a radically different approach: it didn't immediately abolish slavery but profoundly transformed and humanized it, setting clear guidelines aimed at its eventual elimination. Yet, a deeply controversial and sensitive issue arises regarding the relationship between masters and their slave women (concubines)—referred to in the Quran as relations with "those whom your right hands possess."
Today, this topic sparks heated debates and confusion. Many Muslims and non-Muslims alike struggle to understand how a religion dedicated to justice and compassion could allow such practices. It is important to approach this topic openly and honestly, acknowledging its sensitivity while remaining clear about what Islam actually teaches.
We must remember that slavery under Islam was fundamentally different from the brutal, race-based slavery practiced in the West. Islam imposed strict rules, gave slaves unprecedented rights, and created clear pathways to freedom.
Yes, this is controversial, but as Muslims, we believe in the ultimate wisdom of Allah. He allowed and regulated certain practices for profound reasons, even if we may not fully grasp them at first glance. Understanding this wisdom is crucial. It shows how Islam provided humanity with a clear path toward justice, dignity, and ultimately the abolition of slavery itself.
In this article, we'll explore:
- What Islam actually says about slavery and concubines.
- Why Islam allowed intimacy with slaves.
- How Islamic slavery drastically differed from Western slavery.
- The historical and social context that made concubinage practical and even beneficial at the time.
- How the Quran and Hadith addressed this issue directly.
- The views of classical and modern scholars on slavery and concubinage.
- Why Islam's gradual approach to ending slavery was uniquely effective.
This honest and open discussion aims to clarify misunderstandings, highlight the compassionate and transformative principles Islam brought to a harsh reality, and reaffirm our commitment as Muslims to justice and mercy. Even if certain details are challenging, understanding the whole picture helps us appreciate Islam’s timeless wisdom and its profound ability to uplift human dignity.
Islamic vs. Western Slavery: Key Differences
Islamic slavery was fundamentally different from the race-based chattel slavery that later developed in the West. Understanding these differences is important:
Religious vs. Racial Basis: In Islamic law, slavery was not based on race or color. Most slaves came through warfare or were imported, and Islam saw slavery as arising from non-Muslim prisoners of war, not any particular ethnicity. By contrast, Western slavery (e.g. the Atlantic slave trade) targeted Africans based on race, creating a racial caste of slaves.
Rights and Treatment: Islam introduced rights for slaves unheard of in other systems. The Prophet Muhammad taught, “Your slaves are your brothers. Allah has placed them under your authority. So whoever has a brother under his command should feed him from what he eats and dress him from what he wears. Do not make them do what is beyond their ability, and if you do, then help them” (Sahih al-Bukhari 30). This humane treatment – feeding, clothing, and not overworking slaves – was a religious duty. In the Western plantation system, slaves often had no such protections and were treated cruelly as mere property.
Social Mobility: In Islamic history, slaves could rise to high positions. Some became scholars, generals, and even rulers. For example, slave-soldiers called Mamluks became sultans in Egypt, and many caliphs were born to slave mothers. In fact, 34 of the 37 Abbasid caliphs (Islamic rulers in Baghdad) had mothers who were former slaves. Children born to a concubine and her master were free and equal in status to children from free wives. In the American and European slave systems, by contrast, a child born to an enslaved mother was automatically a slave, with no hope of equality.
Manumission and Integration: Islam strongly encouraged freeing slaves (manumission). Freeing slaves was considered a virtuous act that could forgive sins. Both the Quran and Hadith urge believers to free slaves as an act of charity and penance. A freed slave in Islam became a normal member of society, often taking the family name of their former owner and facing no legal obstacles to integration. In Western slavery, even freed individuals (if they managed to gain freedom) often faced legal discrimination or could be re-enslaved.
Sources of Enslavement: Kidnapping free people into slavery was strictly forbidden in Islam. The Prophet Muhammad said in a Hadith Qudsi (holy hadith), “There are three people against whom I will be a plaintiff on the Day of Judgment: one is he who enslaves a free person, sells him and consumes the money”. Thus, unlike the widespread kidnapping and slave-raiding that fueled Western slavery, Islamic law limited new slaves to one source only: captured prisoners of war. Debt slavery, enslaving criminals, or raiding villages for slaves were banned. This was a major reform that Islam introduced to gradually eliminate slavery’s other sources.
In short, Islamic teachings made slavery much more humane and restrictive than in other systems. Slaves were to be treated kindly, and most paths into slavery were cut off. Over time, these principles helped differentiate Islamic slavery from the far harsher Western model.
Slavery in Islamic History: A Brief Overview
When Islam emerged in 7th-century Arabia, slavery was already a worldwide institution. Islam faced the challenge of reforming this practice in a society where it was deeply entrenched. Here’s the historical context of how slavery functioned under Islam:
Common Roles: Slaves in Islamic societies served in many roles – domestic workers, soldiers, laborers, and concubines (slave wives). Some were tasked with hard labor, like mining or agriculture, while others became administrators or mamluk warriors. Importantly, many slaves rose to prominent status. For example, armies of slave-soldiers in some Muslim empires (like the Mamluks and Janissaries) even seized power and ruled. It was not unheard of for a former slave to become a governor or for the sons of slaves to become kings.
How People Became Slaves: Early Islamic rule greatly limited who could be enslaved. The only legitimate source was captivity in war. If non-Muslim enemies fought the Muslims and were captured, they could be made slaves. Women and children captives might be distributed as slaves (women could become concubines). In practice, the Arab slave trade also brought in slaves from outside lands (for example, from Africa via the trans-Saharan trade or from Europe via the Ottoman conquests). However, Islamic law forbade targeting Muslim civilians or any innocent people for slavery. Unlike the trans-Atlantic trade, there was no concept of enslaving an entire race; it was usually the aftermath of warfare.
Rights of Slave Women (Concubines): In pre-Islamic Arabia and other cultures, a slave woman’s children would be born slaves with no rights. Islam changed that. If a slave woman bore a child to her master, she earned a special status called “Umm al-Walad” (mother of a child). Caliph Umar bin al-Khattab established that:
- She cannot be sold and cannot be separated from her child.
- She is freed upon her master’s death.
- Her child is born free and is legally equal to children born to free wives.
These rules were revolutionary. They meant a concubine’s child could inherit and be a full member of society, and the mother herself would eventually become free. This gave slave mothers security and dignity. Historian Bernard Lewis notes that Islamic law in this regard was far more humane than Roman or Greek law, where a slave’s children were simply slaves by default.
Integration and Emancipation: Many early Muslims, inspired by the Prophet, freed their slaves. The Prophet Muhammad’s close companion Abu Bakr spent his wealth to free slaves who were persecuted, like Bilal ibn Rabah, who later became the first caller to prayer (mu’adhdhin). The Quran and Hadith made freeing slaves a noble act of worship. For instance, freeing slaves is recommended as expiation (compensation) for certain sins or mistakes (such as accidental killing, breaking oaths, or saying forbidden words to one’s wife). Because of these teachings, the population of free Muslims kept growing as slaves were manumitted in large numbers over time.
Treatment: Islam improved slaves’ welfare. They were considered part of the household (almost like extended family, though with a different status). The Prophet’s teachings emphasized kindness: a slave owner was expected to feed and clothe slaves as he did himself and not to abuse them (Sahih al-Bukhari 30). Education and religious instruction were also given to slaves. Many slaves converted to Islam and were treated as brothers in faith. Prophet Muhammad even said, “Whoever slaps his slave or beats him, the expiation (atonement) is to free the slave” (Hadith, Muslim). This discouraged abuse. In essence, Islamic society acknowledged the humanity of slaves and gave them avenues for honor and freedom.
Concubinage (Intimacy with Slave Women): Islam allowed a male master to have intimate relations with an unmarried female slave without a formal marriage. This practice, known as concubinage, was common at the time. Islam regulated it strictly: such relations were only allowed with women acquired through lawful means (e.g. war captives) and each slave woman could only have one master (to prevent exploitation by multiple men). If the master chose to have a relationship with her, she became exclusively his partner – he could not then sell her off for others. Any child born from this union was free and gave the mother new rights (as noted above). While by today’s standards this arrangement raises concerns, in ancient times it provided a captive woman with the protection of a household and recognized status as a mother, rather than leaving her unprotected in war camps. We will discuss the wisdom behind this further below.
In summary, Islam tackled slavery by humanizing it and setting strict rules. It did not eliminate slavery overnight – doing so in the 7th century was not feasible without causing social collapse. Instead, Islam aimed to improve conditions for slaves, restrict new enslavements, and encourage liberation. Over centuries, these principles would pave the way for slavery’s peaceful abolition in Muslim lands.
Quranic Verses on Slavery and Concubinage
The Quran – Islam’s holy book – addresses slavery in several verses. It acknowledges the existence of slavery but repeatedly urges kindness and freedom for slaves. It also makes clear the allowance for intimacy with female slaves under specific conditions. Here are some key Quranic verses related to this topic (quoted with translations and context):
Quran 4:3 – “If you fear that you will not deal justly with orphan girls, then marry those that please you of [other] women, two, three, or four. But if you fear that you will not be just, then [marry only] one or those your right hand possesses. That is more suitable to prevent you from injustice.”
Analysis: This verse established a limit of four wives in marriage, which was itself a reform (men previously had no set limit). Notably, it says if a man cannot be fair with multiple wives, he should only marry one or be content with “those your right hand possesses.” “Those your right hand possesses” is a Quranic term referring to slaves/concubines. The verse implies that caring for a concubine (a slave woman) is an alternative if one cannot afford or manage another wife. Classical scholars interpreted that a concubine does not count toward the four-wife limit, since she is not a wife with a formal marriage contract. However, the man is still required to treat her kindly and fulfill her rights. This verse links to the context of orphans and widows after battle – instead of exploiting orphan girls, men were encouraged to either marry responsibly or look after war captives in a lawful way.Quran 4:24 – “And [forbidden to you are] all married women except those your right hands possess. This is Allah’s decree for you. Beyond these, it is lawful for you to seek [wives] using your wealth in a proper marriage, desiring chastity not lust.…”
Analysis: This verse was revealed after a battle and addresses a specific situation. It says that Muslim men cannot have sexual relations with married women – except female captives who were married to non-Muslim men. In a war context, if a married woman was captured, her previous marriage was considered ended at capture (Sahih Muslim 1456a). After ensuring the woman was not pregnant (aniddah
waiting period), she could become a concubine to a Muslim master. This was a delicate issue: the companions hesitated to touch captive women who had husbands. Allah revealed this verse to clarify it was allowed once the captives became “right hand possessants” (slaves) (Sahih Muslim 1456a). In essence, the verse made an exception that a female prisoner of war can be taken as a concubine even if she was formerly married, since her prior marriage ties are cut by captivity. This permitted intimacy prevented these women from being left alone or abused indiscriminately – they came under the care of households instead. It’s important to note this applied only in the context of legitimate war captives; no other married women were ever allowed. The verse ends by reminding men to seek women “desiring chastity, not lust,” underscoring that even with slaves the intention should not be mere desire but building a family and caring for them.Quran 23:5-6 – “...who guard their private parts (chastity), except from their wives or those that their right hands possess, for then they are free from blame.”
Quran 70:29-30 – (Similarly states:) “And those who guard their chastity, except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed they are not to be blamed.”
Analysis: These verses appear in descriptions of righteous believers. They make clear that, in Islam, sexual relations are only lawful in two cases: (1) with one’s legitimate wife, or (2) with a female slave one owns. In either case, the person is “free from blame.” This Quranic endorsement shows that Islam viewed intimacy with one’s concubine as a legal, morally acceptable act – not considered adultery or promiscuity. Any other sexual relationship (outside of marriage or concubinage) is condemned as fornication or adultery. By listing “wives and those your right hand possesses” side by side, the Quran puts concubines in a similar category as wives in terms of sexual morality. Of course, wives and concubines did not have identical social status – wives had formal marriage contracts and more rights – but this verse established that within those two bonds (marriage or ownership) sexual intimacy is allowed in Islam. All other avenues are forbidden. This was a way to regulate sexual relations and protect society from the chaos of prostitution and zina (unlawful sex). It’s also implied that a man should not be intimate with anyone else’s slave woman, only his own; just as one cannot approach someone else’s wife.Quran 33:50 – “O Prophet! We have made lawful to you: your wives to whom you have given their dowries, and those (slave women) whom your right hand possesses from what Allah has granted you as captives, …”
Analysis: This verse was addressed specifically to Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. It lists the categories of women that were lawful for him, including any slave girls given to him as war captives. The Prophet, like other Muslim men of the time, could have concubines. In his life, Prophet Muhammad had a famous Coptic Egyptian slave named Mariya (Maria the Copt) who was sent as a gift by a foreign ruler; she bore him a son named Ibrahim. Some reports call her a “concubine” while others indicate the Prophet married her – but Quran 33:50 would have made it permissible for him to take her without marriage. This shows that even for the Prophet, such relations were allowed by God’s command. It’s important to highlight that the Prophet was known to treat his slaves or concubines with utmost kindness and justice. Also, whatever was allowed for the Prophet in this verse was likewise allowed for other Muslim men (except the Prophet had some exclusive marital permissions as well). The mention of “what Allah has granted you as captives” ties the allowance of concubines directly to war captives – again emphasizing that is the only legitimate source.Quran 24:33 – “… And if any of those whom your right hands possess (your slaves) seek a deed of emancipation (to buy their freedom), then write it for them if you know goodness in them, and give them something out of the wealth of Allah which He has given you. And do not force your slave girls into prostitution if they desire chastity, seeking the interests of worldly life. And if someone compels them, then indeed Allah is forgiving and merciful to them.”
Analysis: This verse shows Islam’s approach to gradually eliminating slavery and protecting enslaved women. First, it instructs owners that if a slave asks for a “written contract” to earn their freedom (called mukataba), the owner should grant it as long as the slave is responsible (“if you know any good in them”). In other words, slaves had a right to request an agreement to work and pay for their freedom, and owners are told to facilitate it and even financially help them to free themselves. This was a formal path to freedom within Islamic law. Second, the verse explicitly forbids forcing slave women into prostitution. Unfortunately, in many societies, female slaves were exploited for prostitution by their masters. The Quran condemns this: if a slave girl wishes to remain chaste, her owner must not exploit her for money. And if a slave girl is forced into such an act, the sin is on the one who forced her; Allah will forgive the victimized slave for what she was compelled to do. This compassionate ruling protected the dignity of female slaves. It also underscores that while Islam permitted a master to have relations with his slave himself, it absolutely did not allow hiring her out or any form of pimping. Her intimacy was only for her master in a quasi-marital way, not for others as a commercial sex worker. This verse thus safeguarded women from sexual exploitation and encouraged the freeing of slaves.
Summary of Quranic guidance: The Quran’s verses on slavery consistently aimed at improving conditions for slaves and paving the road to freedom. Intimacy with female slaves was permitted within a moral framework – only with one’s own slaves and under responsible circumstances. At the same time, the Quran extols freeing slaves as a great act of piety (see Quran 90:13, Quran 2:177, among others). The Quran created a balance: acknowledging the reality of slavery and concubinage at the time, but gradually steering the community toward emancipation and mercy. It was a transitional approach: regulate it, humanize it, and slowly phase it out. All these verses would later be interpreted by scholars to ensure slaves were treated with justice and eventually freed.
Hadith: The Prophet’s Teachings on Slavery and Concubines
The Hadith (sayings and actions of Prophet Muhammad) give further details on how slaves and concubines were to be treated. They also provide real-life context for the Quranic allowances. Here are some important Hadiths related to slavery and intimacy:
1. Kindness and Brotherhood: The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ repeatedly reminded Muslims that slaves are human beings with dignity. In one famous incident, a companion named Abu Dharr al-Ghifari had a slave and Abu Dharr once insulted the man’s mother (a racist taunt). The Prophet reproached Abu Dharr, saying: “You are a man who still has ignorance in you. Your slaves are your brothers. Allah has put them under your care. So feed them with what you eat, clothe them with what you wear. Do not burden them with work they cannot do; if you assign them such tasks, then help them.” (Sahih al-Bukhari 30). This hadith, found in Sahih Bukhari, shows the Prophet equating a master’s relationship to a slave with that of brothers. This revolutionary idea struck at the heart of the master-slave power imbalance. It became a fundamental rule in Islam: a slave owner must treat the slave like his own family. As a result, many pious Muslims would seat slaves at the same table, share the same food and clothes, and generally care for them. This teaching also motivated owners to free slaves, since they saw them as brethren in faith.
2. Prohibition of Enslaving Free People: Prophet Muhammad strongly condemned capturing free people to enslave them. He said, “The unjust kidnapper who sells a free person into slavery will be Allah’s opponent on Judgment Day.” This is recorded in a Hadith (narrated in Bukhari and Ibn Majah) mentioned earlier in Maududi’s writing. This principle meant that Islam outlawed the slave trading practices that later became common in the Atlantic slave trade. Under Islamic law, it was haram (forbidden) to raid a village or ambush a population just to take slaves. Sadly, not all Muslim rulers followed this perfectly in history, but the religious teaching was clear and “general – not limited to any race or nation”. This Hadith established a precedent that any form of slavery outside the narrowly permitted POW context was oppression.
3. Encouragement to Free Slaves: Many hadiths encourage freeing slaves. For example, the Prophet said, “Whoever frees a Muslim slave, Allah will free each of his limbs from the Fire in return for each limb of the slave” (Sahih Muslim). In another hadith, the Prophet promised Paradise for someone who frees even part of a slave (by helping in a slave’s contract of manumission). The companions of the Prophet took this to heart. It was common that if a Muslim mistreated a slave or even got angry at them, he would free the slave as penance. The hadith literature is full of examples of the Prophet’s companions liberating slaves to seek Allah’s pleasure. This created a culture where, over generations, the number of slaves in Muslim lands steadily declined as more gained freedom. Unlike in the Americas, where slave populations grew due to breeding and continued importation, in many Muslim regions the slave population remained flat or dropped because of manumissions and the rule that children of concubines are born free.
4. Hadiths on Concubinage (Intimacy with Captive Women): Several authentic hadiths deal with the issue of Muslim warriors and captive women after battles. One important narration is by Abu Sa‘id al-Khudri regarding the Battle of Banu al-Mustaliq. He said: “We went out with Allah’s Messenger on the campaign of Al-Mustaliq and we captured some female prisoners from the Arabs. We desired women (for we were away from our wives), but we also wanted to ransom them (back to their people for money). So we intended to have intercourse with them while practicing ‘azl (coitus interruptus, to avoid pregnancy). We asked the Prophet about this and he said: ‘There is no need (no harm) in doing that, for if any soul is destined to be born, it will be born.’”. This hadith is found in Sahih Bukhari (No. 2542) and Sahih Muslim with similar wording.
Let’s unpack this: The Muslim soldiers had female captives. They didn’t want to impregnate them because if the women became pregnant, they could not be sold or ransomed (since carrying the owner’s child grants freedom after his death). They considered temporarily not having intercourse, but being young men separated from their wives, they “desired them”. The Prophet’s response did not forbid them from intimacy with the captives – thus confirming the Quranic allowance. He simply told them that their attempt to prevent pregnancy (‘azl) would not ultimately prevent Allah’s will about childbirth. In other words, he allowed them to be intimate with the captive women, and basically said whether you withdraw or not, if Allah wills a child, it will happen anyway.
It’s important to note: the hadith nowhere suggests any coercive assault. These women were distributed to the Muslim fighters by the Prophet (as the leader) in an organized manner. They became the concubines of those men, effectively a part of their household. Islamic law required that a captive woman first undergo a waiting period to ensure she was not pregnant from before; then one man could have relations with her. The hadith also mentions the men were thinking of future ransom or sale, which might sound bad to us, but at that time it was seen as potentially returning the women to their families. The Prophet’s companions only engaged in intercourse after confirming it was permitted and morally okay. This hadith shows the practice was regulated under supervision – not a chaotic abuse, but part of the rules of war at the time.
Another hadith from the Battle of Hunayn (Autas) complements this. Some Muslim fighters hesitated to touch captive women because those women’s husbands (pagans) were still alive. Then the verse Quran 4:24 (quoted above) was revealed to clarify it was permissible (Sahih Muslim 1456a). This context demonstrates that the Prophet and the Quran addressed the concerns of both the captives and the captors to make the situation as humane as possible under the circumstances of war.
5. No Zina in Slave Relations: The companions of Prophet Muhammad never viewed relations with their slave girls as sin or “zina” (adultery/fornication), because the Quran explicitly made it halal (permissible). In one report, a man questioned this, thinking it resembled extramarital sex. A respected scholar explained: “Allah has permitted intimacy with a slave woman if the man owns her. This is not regarded as adultery. Allah says… ‘those who guard their chastity except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for then they are free from blame’. What is meant by ‘those whom their right hands possess’ is slave women or concubines.”. In other words, Islamic teaching was clear that a man’s concubine was like his lawful wife in terms of sexual morality. There should be no shame or sense of sin in that relationship. This removed any stigma for the children born or the people involved. It was a normalized part of society at that time. (Of course, that was within the historical context – as we will see, later Muslim societies moved away from this as slavery was abolished.)
6. Reward for Raising and Freeing Slave Concubines: The Prophet also gave glad tidings to those who educated and freed their slave women and then married them. He said: “Whoever has a slave girl, educates her properly, frees her and then marries her, will have a double reward” (Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim). This hadith encouraged owners to invest in their female slaves’ well-being and eventually elevate their status to wife. It indeed happened in history that many Muslim men would free their concubines and marry them formally, especially if they had children together. The mother of the Prophet’s son Ibrahim, Maria, was honored and freed; many believe the Prophet took her as a wife after the birth. This practice blurred the line between concubine and wife, showing Islam’s preference for eventually freeing and formally marrying these women when possible.
In essence, the Hadith literature mirrors the Quranic ethos: treat slaves like family, no oppression, no humiliation, and use the institution as a means to uplift people, not degrade them. While the concept of concubinage sounds strange today, in practice the Prophet established guidelines to ensure it was not abusive. The ultimate goal was always to bring people from slavery to freedom and from paganism to Islam, thereby making former slaves into equal brethren in religion.
The Wisdom Behind Allowing Concubinage
Why would Allah, in His wisdom, allow men to have intimate relations with slave women? To modern minds, this may appear as a loophole for lust or a morally troubling idea. However, Islamic scholars through the ages have discussed several wisdoms and benefits behind this practice in its historical context. Here are some key points often mentioned:
Ethical Treatment of War Captives: In the past, when wars occurred, the victors often massacred the men and left women and children destitute. Islam offered an alternative: captured women and children became part of the households of the Muslim warriors. This might sound harsh today, but consider the alternatives at that time: If released immediately in a hostile environment, these women could die of starvation or fall victim to other tribes. If left in camps, they could be raped or abused by anyone. By assigning them to households, Islam actually aimed to protect their dignity in a terrible situation. The concubine would live under the care of one man, like a wife. She wouldn’t be mistreated (Islam forbade it) and had rights to food, clothing, shelter, and eventually freedom. This system integrated captives into society. Scholar Muhammad Qutb noted that while “Europe abhors (the idea of concubines), at the same time it gladly allows the most odious form of animalism in which a man has illicit relations with any girl he encounters to gratify his passions”. His point was that Islam’s method – though not “ideal” by modern standards – was more responsible and regulated than the rampant rape or prostitution that often happened otherwise. Each captive woman became attached to one man’s household rather than being a victim to many.
Limiting Harm in Warfare: Islamic jurists argued that enslavement was a merciful alternative to execution in war. Instead of killing prisoners (which was common in many ancient wars), Islam generally prohibited executing captives. Male prisoners of war were either exchanged, ransomed, or in some cases enslaved to work. Female prisoners were not to be killed at all. Enslavement, as uncomfortable as it sounds now, was seen as “less evil than killing”. It gave the captive a chance to live, possibly convert to Islam, and eventually earn freedom. As one scholar, Shaykh Al-Shanqiti, explained: “When Allah enables the Muslim fighters to overcome the disbelievers in battle, He gives them ownership of them by means of slavery… If the ruler chooses, he may free them or ransom them instead, if that serves the community’s interest.”. In practice, the Prophet often did free or ransom captives. But when concubinage did occur, it was viewed as a practical necessity of war in that era. It prevented greater harm and gave the captive women a defined status and care.
Gradual Social Change: The allowance of slavery and concubinage in Islam can be seen as part of gradualism in legislation. Slavery was like a deeply rooted tree – uprooting it overnight could have caused chaos. Slaves were integrated into the economy and households; immediate abolition could have left many jobless and homeless in a society with no welfare system. Instead, Islam tackled the problem in steps: first cut off the sources of new slaves (no kidnapping, etc., only war captives) , then improve conditions, then encourage freeing at every opportunity. Over time, this strategy would shrink slavery to a point of natural extinction. Sayyid Qutb, a 20th-century Islamic thinker, wrote: “Slavery was a worldwide structure conducted among all nations with prisoners of war. It was necessary for Islam to adopt a similar practice until the world devised a new code for prisoners other than enslavement.”. Indeed, once humanity (much later) agreed on better treatments for POWs (like the Geneva Conventions), Muslims could easily transition away from slavery – and they did. The gradual approach is considered a wise strategy by many scholars, akin to how Islam gradually banned alcohol. It allowed society to adjust and for slavery to die out naturally.
Avenues for Conversion and Brotherhood: When slaves entered Muslim households, many embraced Islam by seeing the faith up close. A concubine or slave who accepted Islam became the brother or sister in religion of the owner (though still a slave in law until freed). This religious bond often led to the owner freeing the person out of love and to seek reward from Allah. In the meantime, bringing slaves into Muslim homes helped spread Islam’s message gently. There are accounts of entire communities eventually converting after being taken as slaves and later freed. In essence, Islam used the existing institution of slavery to elevate people spiritually and socially. A famous example is Bilal, the Ethiopian slave who converted and was freed by Abu Bakr; he rose to become one of the most respected companions of the Prophet. If Islam had said “no one can touch a captive woman,” perhaps those women would have been left in refugee-like conditions. Instead, by allowing concubinage, those women became part of Muslim families, often adopted Islam, and their children were Muslim and free. This integrated former enemies into the Muslim community within one generation – arguably a wise strategy for community-building.
Preventing Zina and Prostitution: Islam strongly emphasizes chastity for both men and women. By limiting sexual relations to wives and concubines, it closed the door to other forms of sexual exploitation. A man was not allowed to just sleep around with random women; he could only be intimate with a committed partner – either through marriage or through the bond of owning a concubine. In the historical context, soldiers and men would often be tempted to rape or use prostitutes, especially during long military campaigns. Islam forbade rape and prostitution, offering concubinage as the channel for sexual needs. One might view it as a form of accountability – the man is responsible for that slave woman if he chooses to be with her; she’s not a stranger or a one-night stand. As scholar Muhammad Qutb pointed out, Western societies eventually got rid of slavery but allowed widespread casual sex, which Islam sees as morally corrupt. Islam’s system attempted to solve one problem (the presence of captives and men’s desires) with the lesser of two evils in that era, while keeping higher moral aims in view.
Encouraging Morality and Care: The existence of concubinage came with moral responsibilities. Masters were expected to care for their concubines and any children. Children of concubines were fully recognized as the master’s children – no stigma attached. This is in stark contrast to, say, the American slavery situation where slave women were abused by masters but their children were kept as slaves or sold, and often the master wouldn’t acknowledge them. In Islam, if a concubine had a child, the father had to acknowledge the child (in most schools of law). The child was free and could even inherit. This discouraged irresponsible behavior. In fact, knowing that a pregnancy would free the mother and create a free heir, some masters might avoid intercourse – which again shows that concubinage in Islam was not about reckless lust, but a regulated tie. Many Muslim masters did decide to marry their concubines, especially if they showed faith and good character. Thus, the system had internal checks that promoted family formation and kindness over mere gratification.
Comparison with Other Systems: When comparing to other historical systems (Greek, Roman, Persian, or later European), one can see relative benefits in Islam’s approach. For instance, Roman law treated slaves as property with no rights; a Roman master could kill a slave with little repercussion. Islam absolutely forbade killing slaves and in fact killing a slave unlawfully was a punishable murder. In Persian and Byzantine lands, sexual exploitation was rampant, but Islam limited a man to a set number of partners (wives plus concubines) under accountability. Islam also forbade separating families: a mother and her child could not be split up in sale , whereas slave families were routinely torn apart in American slavery. All these differences show the wisdom of Allah in guiding a brutal practice into a much gentler form until it could be erased. One scholar noted: “These rules (like umm al-walad) gave more rights to slaves than Roman and Greek laws did… in Islamic law, if either parent was free, the child is free”. So the trajectory of Islamic law was towards freedom and human dignity.
In summary, the allowance of intimacy with slaves was never meant to be about lechery or devaluing women. It was a product of its time, intended to deal with the reality of war captives in a manner that balanced justice with mercy. Islam made the best out of a bad situation by protecting those captives, integrating them into Muslim families, and setting them on a path to eventual freedom. It also curbed the temptations of uncontrolled sexual violence by channeling relations into recognized, responsible forms. While by modern standards we would say “why not just outlaw it entirely,” history shows that Islam’s incremental approach achieved a lasting moral improvement that immediate abolition might not have in that context. The wisdom of Allah can be seen in how over time, the Islamic principles indeed led to a world where slavery is abolished and no longer needed.
Why Islam’s Perspective Is the Best (Comparative Insights)
Looking at alternatives in history, one can argue that Islam’s perspective on slavery and concubinage was superior in compassion and results. Here’s a comparison with other systems, to highlight why many scholars say the Islamic approach was the best possible for its time:
Pre-Islamic Arabia: Before Islam, Arabs practiced slavery without rules. Female captives had no protection – they could be used by many men or sold off at whim. Children born to slaves were usually kept as slaves and not acknowledged by their fathers. Infanticide of slave babies was not uncommon if they were seen as inconvenient. Islam ended these cruel practices. The introduction of legal concubinage with rights meant a man could not share his slave girl with others (a common pre-Islamic exploitation). He also had to take responsibility for any child she bore (the child could even call him father and inherit). This was a huge moral step up from the anarchic pre-Islamic norm.
The Christian West (Middle Ages): In Medieval Europe, slavery slowly gave way to serfdom, but sexual serfdom and exploitation of servant girls by lords was widespread (though unofficial). The Church did not provide clear guidelines or rights for serfs comparable to Islam’s rights for slaves. Moreover, when Europeans later engaged in the African slave trade, there was no religious mandate in Christianity that protected slaves’ rights or encouraged freeing them. Many Christian slave owners considered conversion of slaves as a reason not to free them (some colonies even made laws that baptism does not free a slave, to avoid owners freeing Christian slaves). In Islam, by contrast, conversion to Islam was encouraged and often led to manumission (since enslaving a fellow Muslim was discouraged or limited). Also, historically, if a non-Muslim slave became Muslim, their Muslim owner was strongly encouraged to free them, especially if the slave was a prisoner of war who accepted Islam. This difference meant Islam’s system was spiritually and ethically more encouraging of slaves’ upliftment than what developed later in the Christian world.
Trans-Atlantic Slavery: The Western slavery of the 17th–19th centuries is often considered one of the most brutal systems – people were kidnapped from Africa (a crime in Islam) and enslaved purely for economic exploitation. Families were torn apart, slavery was for life (with even future generations automatically enslaved), and racial ideology deemed slaves “inferior”. Islam’s approach contrasts sharply:
- It banned raiding for slaves.
- It taught that all humans are from Adam and no race is superior (the Prophet’s Last Sermon famously said “No Arab is superior to a non-Arab, and no white to a black, except in piety”).
- Islamic law made slave status impermanent – through many ways a slave could become free, and children of certain unions were free.
- In Islam, a master had to provide for slaves in old age as well, not discard them. In the U.S., freed older slaves often starved because owners wouldn’t care for them once they couldn’t work.
These differences meant that while Western slavery created a permanent underclass and left deep racial scars, Islamic slavery was more fluid – slaves could and did become an integrated part of society over time. It’s telling that by the 20th century, virtually all Muslim-majority countries had abolished slavery without civil wars, whereas in the U.S. a horrific war was fought to end slavery. The Islamic ethos made it easier for Muslims to accept abolition, as it was seen as fulfilling their own religious ideals of freedom and brotherhood.
Alternate Solutions for POWs: One might ask, why not just detain prisoners of war temporarily and then release them? In modern times we have POW camps and exchanges. In ancient times, this was logistically very hard – there were no states who’d reliably exchange prisoners or care for enemy prisoners long-term. Often, killing or enslavement were the only options. Islam chose enslavement with humane treatment over mass execution. Compare this to some other civilizations: for instance, the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 20:10-14) instructs the Israelites to kill all male captives and take women and children as slaves after conquering a city. Islam actually was gentler: it didn’t order killing all males in most cases, and even male prisoners could become slaves rather than being killed (and thereby get a chance to later be freed or ransomed). So within the context of pre-modern warfare, Islam’s rules were progressive and merciful. Captives lived and often eventually regained liberty. Many alternative systems at the time did not offer that hope.
Moral Consistency: Islam’s allowance of concubinage came with a strict moral code, as discussed. In contrast, many societies had hypocrisy: for example, 19th-century Victorian Europe prided itself on monogamy but had a booming underground of prostitution and mistresses for the wealthy. Islam, by allowing polygamy up to four wives and concubinage, set a clear, above-board structure for those who might otherwise turn to adultery or prostitution. It can be argued that this prevented a lot of secret sins. A quote attributed to Muhammad Qutb highlights this: Europe hated the idea of concubines, but “gladly allows a man to have illicit relations with any girl” casually. Islam’s perspective was that it’s better for a man to lawfully care for an extra woman as a concubine than to visit prostitutes or have mistresses with no responsibility. In that sense, Islam’s system was morally superior to the often hidden exploitation in other cultures.
End Goal – Freedom for All: Islam’s end goal was a world with no slavery. The Quran hints at this ideal by repeatedly pairing righteousness with freeing slaves. One modern scholar, Tamara Sonn, noted that virtually all Islamic interpreters saw the Quran as setting an ideal of a society where no person is enslaved. Islam’s laws were aimed toward that ideal. When we see that ultimately Muslim societies did eliminate slavery, it confirms that Islam’s approach worked in the long run. Other systems either collapsed before ending slavery or had to be pressured from outside to change. But in the Muslim world, the seeds of abolition were sown by Islam itself. As a result, when the 19th–20th centuries came, all major Muslim countries outlawed slavery, largely peacefully. For example, the Ottoman Empire issued decrees to stop the slave trade and by 1924 abolished slavery entirely ; Saudi Arabia officially abolished slavery in 1962, and Mauritania (the last Muslim country with slavery) in 1981. In 1990 a group of Muslim nations even declared human rights principles in line with Islam, including that “no one has the right to enslave” another. This shows the Islamic perspective ultimately led to the same conclusion as modern human rights, but through its own ethical development. Alternative systems often had to be forced into abolition through war or economic change, whereas Islam created a moral pathway to abolition from within.
For these reasons, many Muslims believe that Islam’s approach to slavery was the best possible given the historical context. It humanized a dehumanizing practice and set humanity on a course to eventually leave it behind. As Abul A’la Maududi wrote, after Islam forbade enslaving free people and limited it to POWs, “the only form of slavery left... were prisoners of war” and even those were often exchanged or freed. Islam systematically closed all other doors to slavery. This stands in stark contrast to Western colonial powers that abolished slavery domestically but then exploited colonies through forced labor or indentured servitude (a kind of pseudo-slavery) for many more years. Islam’s perspective, rooted in justice and gradual reform, avoided such contradictions.
Views of Scholars: Classical and Contemporary
Throughout Islamic history, scholars have discussed slavery and concubinage in their writings. There was consensus (ijma’) among classical scholars that slavery was permissible only under the conditions set by the Sharia (Islamic law), and that intimacy with female slaves was halal (allowed) for the owner. However, they also uniformly encouraged freeing slaves and kind treatment. Here are a few notable scholarly perspectives:
Classical Scholars: All four madhhabs (schools of law – Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, Hanbali) recognized the rules we’ve outlined. They devoted chapters in their books of fiqh (law) to “Kitab al-Riqaq” (Book of Slaves) explaining rights and duties. For example, Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa both held that a concubine’s `awrah (parts to conceal) is less than a free woman’s, meaning she didn’t have to cover hair in public in some interpretations. This indicated they saw concubines as having a different social status, but they also insisted on guarding a concubine’s chastity (she must not be promiscuous). No classical scholar ever suggested that concubinage was outlawed – it was taken for granted as allowed by the Quran. However, scholars like Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar (who commented on the hadith of ‘azl) clarified that consent of the slave woman was not a condition for intimacy, because by being an owned slave, that relationship was part of her master’s rights. This sounds uncomfortable today, but their context was a world where slavery existed and they were simply explaining the law. Despite that, these same scholars would emphasize treating slaves with compassion and not abusing them. Notably, Caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab (a close companion of the Prophet and second Caliph) implemented policies to improve slave welfare – like the rules of umm al-walad we mentioned. He also reportedly said “How can you enslave people who were born free?” when he saw someone unjustly enslaved, underscoring the Islamic principle that free people should remain free.
Abul A’la Maududi (20th c. scholar): Maududi wrote about slavery in his book “Human Rights in Islam.” He highlighted that Islam categorically forbade capturing free people to enslave , quoting the Prophet’s hadith about Allah being the opponent of someone who sells a free man. Maududi notes that after Islam’s reforms, “the only form of slavery left” was dealing with POWs, and even those were often exchanged. He explained that Islam’s framework was to ultimately eliminate slavery by cutting off its sources and encouraging freeing, while managing POWs humanely. Maududi thus presented Islam as a champion of human rights long before modern conventions. His works are respected in circles and they reassure Muslims that Islam did not like slavery, it tolerated it temporarily with the aim of eradicating its worst abuses.
Muhammad Qutb (the brother of Sayyid Qutb, also a writer) in “Islam: The Misunderstood Religion” argued in defense of concubinage by comparing it to Western sexual norms. He said Islam only allows a man to have sexual relations with slave women whom he solely owns, as opposed to Western men who might have casual relations with many women with no responsibility. His tone is defensive, basically saying: Islam’s system is morally cleaner because the man at least is responsible for the woman and her children. Qutb’s view reflects a common apologetic stance among mid-20th century scholars: they acknowledged slavery was not ideal but tried to show Islam handled it better than anyone else.
Sayyid Qutb (mid-20th c. Quran commentator) wrote in his famous tafsir Fi Zilal al-Quran about verse 9:60 and others: “That (concubinage) was when slavery was a worldwide practice… It was necessary for Islam to adopt a similar line until the world found a new way besides enslavement.”. This quote shows that mainstream thought understood slavery as a product of its time, not an eternal need. Qutb implied that once the world changed its practices (which it did by the 20th century), Islam too would have no need for slavery. In essence, classical scholars permitted slavery as an exception, not as a virtue, and modern thinkers reinforced that it was something Islam aimed to outgrow.
Contemporary Scholars: In modern times, virtually all scholars agree that slavery is no longer applicable. While technically, if a real Islamic state fought a defensive war and took POWs, the old rulings could apply, almost every country on earth (including Muslim-majority ones) has signed treaties prohibiting slavery. jurists say Muslims must honor these agreements (as Islam commands keeping pacts). For example, Egypt’s Dar al-Ifta (a leading Islamic authority) states: “Islam limited the sources of slavery with the aim of abolishing it… Islam prohibited enslaving anyone except war captives... and it created many means of emancipating slaves… Islam’s approach was to ban slavery by degrees to maintain social stability.”. They conclude that Islam led to a situation where slavery is abolished and that is a positive fulfillment of Islamic values. Another contemporary scholar, Dr. Bilal Philips, has said that since no legitimate jihad with a Caliphate exists today and international law bans slavery, a Muslim cannot just revive slavery on his own. Mufti Taqi Usmani, a renowned jurist, similarly notes that the door of slavery is effectively closed in our time, and that is not against Islam.
Perhaps more starkly, when the terrorist group ISIS tried to revive slavery in 2014, capturing Yazidi women in Iraq, scholars worldwide – from Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti to Al-Azhar University in Egypt – condemned it. They said ISIS’s actions were a gross misapplication of Islamic law. The scholars argued that because the world has agreed to abandon slavery, and it no longer operates under the old rules or authority, what ISIS did was essentially kidnapping and rape – which is absolutely haram (forbidden) in Islam. This near-unanimous stance among modern scholars underscores that Islam today has no desire to return to the practice of slavery or concubinage. Instead, scholars emphasize Islam’s role in eventually ending these practices.
In summary, classical scholars accepted slavery as law but with many humane regulations, and contemporary scholars view the end of slavery as aligned with Islamic objectives. They encourage Muslims to take pride in how Islam handled the issue in the past and to unequivocally support abolition and fight modern slavery (like human trafficking) today, as a continuation of Islamic teachings of justice.
A Miraculous Social Transformation
While the topic of slavery doesn’t involve miracles in the sense of supernatural events, many Muslims view the transformation that Islam brought to slave practices as a kind of social miracle. Consider this: Within a community that had taken slavery for granted, the Quran and Prophet Muhammad planted the seeds of empathy and freedom so deeply that, over centuries, the practice virtually disappeared among Muslims. This profound change in hearts and norms can be seen as one of the miracles of Islam’s social legislation.
One might also point to a subtle prophecy. The Prophet Muhammad mentioned among the signs of the approaching Day of Judgment that “the slave girl will give birth to her mistress” (Hadith in Sahih Muslim). Scholars have interpreted this in various ways, but one interpretation is that it hints at social upheaval and roles reversing – possibly alluding to slaves gaining freedom and status such that a former slave’s daughter could be as free and noble as the master’s daughter. Some see in this a prediction that slavery would become uncommon or end, as indeed we see today. This is speculative, but it’s interesting that such a hadith exists and is sometimes linked to the emancipation of slaves in the future.
Also notable is how Islam produced figures like Bilal (the freed African slave who became the first mu’adhdhin) and Salman al-Farsi (a Persian former slave who became a close companion of the Prophet). Their stories are almost miraculous in the context of their time: Bilal, once tortured as a slave for saying “God is One,” was not only freed but rose to a position of honor – an unimaginable outcome in most societies of that era. When the Muslim army conquered Makkah, the Prophet asked Bilal to climb the Ka’bah (holiest shrine) to call the Adhan. Seeing a former black slave atop the Ka’bah was a powerful symbol of Islam’s transformative egalitarian spirit. It felt miraculous to many observers. In fact, some elites of Quraysh remarked in astonishment (or annoyance) about how “a slave stands on top of the Ka’bah!” – a sign of the new order Islam brought.
While these are not miracles like splitting the sea, they are miracles of change in human society that Islam achieved. The rapid fading of slavery’s popularity among sincere Muslims, and the ease with which Muslims eventually abolished it (compared to the brutal resistance to abolition in the Americas), can be seen as a fulfillment of Allah’s wisdom. It’s as if Islam set a time-bomb on slavery: it ticked slowly through the centuries – with each good deed of freeing slaves, each restriction, each generation treating slaves a bit better – until the institution had withered away, without a bloody civil war. This peaceful, principled eradication of slavery in many places is a historical marvel in itself.
From a faith perspective, Muslims see in this the guiding hand of Allah. What started as common practice became first a discouraged one and then an extinct one, as Muslims moved closer to the Quranic ideal of freeing the enslaved. Today, the fact that over a billion Muslims agree that slavery is wrong and against Islamic ideals, even though slavery is mentioned in scripture, shows the profound effect of those teachings. In a way, this is a testament to Islam’s success in elevating moral consciousness – a success that can be seen as an everyday miracle.
Modern Muslims and the Legacy of Slavery
Today, slavery is illegal worldwide. No Muslim today can own a slave or concubine under the law, and importantly, no mainstream Muslim wants to – it is seen as a closed chapter of history. However, the legacy of these teachings still affects how Muslims live and think, and it also raises questions from others. Here’s how modern Muslims approach the topic:
Understanding Historical Context: Modern Muslims are taught that when reading Quranic verses or Hadith about slavery, context is key. These teachings applied to a very different world. What Islam did was progressive for the 7th century, even if it doesn’t match 21st-century norms. By understanding the context, Muslims can explain that Islam’s ultimate goal was always justice and compassion. We acknowledge that Islam allowed slavery then – but we also proudly note Islam’s role in making it obsolete. This helps young Muslims reconcile the scripture with current values. It’s similar to how one might view verses in the Bible about slavery or polygamy – as part of a historical context that is no longer applicable.
Defending Islam’s Record: Muslims today often find themselves having to answer criticism about concubinage or slavery in Islam. It’s important to be honest but also to highlight the positive distinctives. We point out facts like: Islam forbade enslaving free people , Islam made freeing slaves a virtuous act , the Prophet and companions freed many slaves, the trans-Atlantic slave trade had nothing to do with Islamic teachings and was in fact condemned by them, etc. By doing so, Muslims aim to correct misunderstandings. Many non-Muslims are surprised to learn that Islam actually restricted slavery and that Islamic slavery was not based on race. Educating others helps reduce the stigma or shock factor when they come across these topics.
Emphasizing Islam’s Anti-Racism and Mercy: The example of Bilal is often shared – how Islam broke racial barriers in the 7th century by raising a black former slave to high honor. Modern Muslims love this story because it shows the spirit of Islam. We also share sayings of the Prophet like, “Free the captives,” “Visit the ill, and feed the hungry,” which includes feeding those in bondage. By focusing on these merciful teachings, Muslims today make it clear that our religion stands for equality of all humans. The term “slaves of Allah” is used in Islam to mean all humans are equally servants of God – a reminder that no person should enslave another as a permanent condition.
Mourning Past Abuses: It’s also true that not all Muslims in history lived up to Islamic ideals. There were instances of abuse in the slave trade involving some Muslim traders, or in later centuries some rulers clung to slavery longer than they should have. Modern Muslims do not defend those practices; instead, we say those were cultural or human failures, not Islamic ones. Just as Christians today disavow the slave-holding practices of some of their ancestors, Muslims do the same. We hold our tradition to its highest standards and criticize those Muslims who violated them. This honest reckoning is important so that we don’t appear to sugarcoat everything. For example, the fact that some Arab traders did engage in the East African slave trade is acknowledged – but then we stress that Islamic law would regard many of those cases (kidnappings, etc.) as sinful. This balanced view helps modern Muslims learn from the past and ensure “never again” for the future.
Fighting Modern Slavery: A crucial way Muslims live the legacy of these teachings today is by combating modern forms of slavery. Sadly, practices like human trafficking, forced labor, debt bondage, and sex trafficking still exist in the world, affecting tens of millions. Muslims see this as an area where the spirit of our faith calls us to action. Since our Prophet emphasized freeing slaves and our scripture speaks of freeing the oppressed, we consider it a religious duty to oppose human trafficking and all forms of exploitation. Muslim organizations are involved in anti-trafficking efforts, rehabilitation of bonded laborers, and raising awareness that even though “slavery” as a legal institution is gone, exploitation persists and must be eradicated. By doing this, we feel we are continuing the mission started 1,400 years ago – the mission to free people and restore their God-given dignity.
Legal and Social Stance: Importantly, modern Islamic jurists have made it clear that abolishing slavery is Islamically valid. There is no call from any respected scholar to reintroduce slavery. When countries like Mauritania finally criminalized slavery (as late as 1981 and enforced later), Muslim scholars supported it, citing Islamic principles of equality. In 2020, if someone tried to justify owning a slave, they would be isolated and condemned by the entire Muslim community. This consensus gives confidence to Muslims that our faith is not at odds with universal human rights today – in fact, it helped create them. Major scholars often quote a saying of Caliph Umar: “When will you enslave people whose mothers bore them free?” to emphasize that freedom is the natural state of humans. Such quotations are highlighted to Muslim youth to reinforce that even our early leaders aimed for a free society.
In daily life, the average Muslim doesn’t think about slavery much – it’s a historical topic. But when it comes up, we approach it with a mix of pride and regret: pride in how Islam improved a bad system, regret that slavery ever had to exist (and recognition that it’s good that it’s gone). We learn from it the values of justice, compassion, and gradual reform. And we apply those values now by standing against new injustices that resemble slavery, like sweatshops or forced domestic servants.
Islam’s Role in the Abolition of Slavery
One might ask: if Islam allowed slavery, how did it lead to abolition? The reality is that Islamic teachings created conditions that eventually made slavery unsustainable in Muslim societies. Here’s how Islamic principles contributed to slavery’s decline and end:
Encouraging Emancipation: As mentioned, freeing slaves was heavily rewarded in Islam. Over centuries, countless individuals were freed because their owners sought spiritual reward or atonement for sins. Some Muslim rulers financed large-scale freeing of slaves. For example, Sultan Moulay Ismail of Morocco (17th century) freed many slaves and integrated them into his army (though he also acquired new ones – so a mixed record). But generally, the pool of slaves in Muslim lands was constantly being drained by emancipation. This meant that without new captures, the institution would shrink. Indeed, by the 19th century, in many Muslim regions the number of slaves was a smaller proportion of society than in centuries prior, making it easier to abolish entirely.
Ending Hereditary Slavery: Islamic law did not absolutely end hereditary slavery (children of two slave parents were usually slaves), but the rule that a child with one free parent is free and the common practice of freeing slave mothers meant fewer people remained slaves generation after generation. Many slave populations in Muslim lands did not reproduce in large numbers (some male slaves were eunuchs, etc.), and those that did often saw their children freed. Meanwhile, in the Americas, slavery was self-reproducing because slave children were automatically slaves by law. Islam’s more flexible approach meant that by the time of abolition, you didn’t have huge multigenerational slave populations in Muslim countries – many had already mixed into the free population. For instance, in some Gulf countries, tribes trace back to freed slaves who became full tribe members. The assimilation of slaves into the population meant that ending slavery was less economically catastrophic and less socially contentious for Muslims.
Moral Evolution: Islamic civilization produced many scholars who spoke out against slavery’s excesses. By the 19th century, a number of Muslim thinkers influenced by Islamic teachings and the global abolition movement started explicitly calling for an end to slavery. They argued that since the conditions that originally warranted it (constant warfare, no POW treaties) had changed, slavery should be phased out completely in line with Islamic justice. For example, in the late 19th century, the Ottoman Sultan Abdul Hamid II, guided by his ulema (scholars), issued orders to halt the African slave trade and closed slave markets. In 1909, Tunisia (a majority-Muslim land) abolished slavery, citing Islamic values of equality. When these changes happened, there was remarkably little religious opposition. This shows that Muslim societies had internalized the idea that slavery was not a desirable thing, and getting rid of it was good and Islamic. Contrast this with the American South, where defenders of slavery argued it was a God-given right and fought a war over it. In Muslim lands, the resistance was comparatively minimal; often the push for abolition was led by the top (rulers) and accepted by the populace.
International Influence and Ijtihad: To be fair, European pressure did play a role especially in the 19th century (colonial powers pushed countries like Egypt, Persia, Zanzibar to stop slave trading). But the ulema (Islamic scholars) used ijtihad (independent reasoning) to respond by saying Islam allows making treaties that ban slavery, and those must be honored. They pointed out that since Islam’s own trajectory was to limit slavery, these treaties were in line with Islamic objectives, not against them. By framing abolition as fulfillment of Islam rather than contradiction, scholars ensured Muslims wouldn’t see it as something forced on them against their faith. Instead, it could be embraced as a positive development. For instance, the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (1990), agreed by Muslim nations, explicitly states no one shall be enslaved. They derived this from Islamic principles of human dignity (karamah) and liberty. Such modern jurisprudence shows that scholars completed the evolution by declaring slavery incompatible with Islam’s broader aims in today’s context.
Social Change: As education spread in the Muslim world, Quranic teachings that all humans are equal like “We honored the children of Adam” (17:70) and that the Prophet was sent as a mercy to all mankind, resonated more and more. Muslim reformers in the 19th century, such as Syed Ahmad Khan in India or Sheikh al-Sanusi in North Africa, emphasized these universal messages. They downplayed legalistic justifications of slavery and highlighted Islam’s emancipatory spirit. This prepared the Muslim public to accept that slavery belonged to the past. By the time laws were passed, most ordinary Muslims saw it as a matter of course. Today, if you ask any Muslim child, “Can a person be a slave?” they would likely answer no, that it’s wrong – because that’s how thoroughly the Islamic ethic of equality has been ingrained, which is a success story of those centuries of teachings.
In short, Islam led to the abolition of slavery through a slow but steady internal revolution of values. Starting from a world where slavery was normal, it guided its followers to envision a world without slavery. The final legal abolition in each country was the last step of that journey. It’s noteworthy that the last nations to outlaw slavery formally (like Mauritania in 1981) are Muslim-majority, showing that remnants lasted – but also that eventually they all conformed to the Islamic and global consensus that slavery must end. Now, any reintroduction of slavery would be seen as a regression and opposed by Muslims, which demonstrates how far the teachings have brought us.
Conclusion
The topic of slavery and intimacy with slaves in Islam is complex, but it showcases Islam’s practical mercy in a harsh historical environment. Islam tempered and tamed the practice of slavery, laid down rights for slaves, opened the doors to freedom wide, and closed the door to new slavery as much as possible. While Islam did permit concubinage, it was under strict rules that aimed to ensure care for captive women and integration of their offspring as free members of society. Over time, these principles did their work: slavery faded away in Muslim lands, and today it survives only as an underground crime that all Muslims join others in fighting.
Modern Muslims can look back and understand that Allah, in His wisdom, allowed certain things at one time to bring about a greater good in the long run. The unity of all believers, the equality of mankind, and the sanctity of marriage and family were all preserved by Islam’s regulations on slavery. And when the world reached a point where slavery was no longer prevalent, Islam had already paved the way to say goodbye to it.
Muslims today approach this topic by explaining the context, expressing that Islam’s true goal was always a just society free of oppression, and by living the values of our faith which include freeing the oppressed and treating every human being as honored. Far from being ashamed, we recognize how Islam dealt with slavery as an example of its forward-looking guidance – a reason that many slaves in the past embraced Islam seeing its comparatively gentle teachings, and a reason we can be confident that our religion stood on the right side of history in the end.
Recommended Books
For those interested in learning more about slavery in Islam, its history, and its rulings, here are some well-regarded books by scholars (mostly) on the subject:
Slavery and Islam by Jonathan A.C. Brown (2019). – A comprehensive and highly accessible book by a Muslim scholar. It explores slavery in Islamic texts and history and addresses tough questions with scholarly insight.
Islam and the Abolition of Slavery by William G. Clarence-Smith (2006). – A detailed historical study of how slavery declined in Muslim societies. Clarence-Smith is a historian who offers a fair analysis of Muslim reformers and movements against slavery.
Human Rights in Islam by Abul A’la Maududi (196 Human Rights in Islam (chapter on Slavery)). – In this work, Maududi, a prominent theologian, discusses how Islam addressed slavery and the rights Islam gave to slaves. It’s a shorter read that captures the Islamic perspective from a 20th-century scholar.
Islam, the Misunderstood Religion by Muhammad Qutb (196 Islam, the Misunderstood Religion (section on Slavery)). – Muhammad Qutb analyzes social aspects of Islam, including a defense of Islam’s record on slavery compared to the West. It reflects a apologetic standpoint from the late 20th century.
Race and Slavery in the Middle East by Bernard Lewis (1992). – While Bernard Lewis was a Jewish historian, this book is often recommended by Muslim scholars for its well-researched information on how slavery operated in Islamic lands and how it differed from Western slavery. It provides useful context and is considered mainstream.