No, the Quran and authentic hadith do not promise men an eternity of abusing prepubescent girls. The argument depends on forcing a modern biological category onto a poetic Arabic word, then reading Paradise as if it contained earthly harm, coercion, and childhood.
What the criticism is getting at
The strongest version of the objection is this: Quran 78:33 describes part of Paradise as "kawa'iba atraba." Some lexicons explain "ka'ib" as a young female whose breasts have become prominent or begun to rise. Critics then map that phrase onto Tanner stage two and call it prepubescent. They add Quran 56:35-37, some tafsir comments about renewed virginity, and a hadith about great sexual strength in Paradise, concluding that Islam eroticizes little girls and makes repeated deflowering a heavenly ideal.
That is a serious charge, so it deserves a careful answer rather than outrage.
What the Quranic words actually establish
Indeed, for the righteous is success: gardens and grapevines, and kawa'ib atrab, and a full cup.
Quran 78:31-34
The word "ka'ib" comes from a root meaning something that has become rounded or prominent, like a cube or raised form. In descriptions of women, classical Arabic used it for youthful beauty and the fullness of the chest. It does not mean "child," and it does not function as a medical puberty chart.
The phrase beside it, "atrab," means of matching or equal age. Classical tafsir commonly understands the description as spouses or companions of harmonious age, beauty, and maturity. It is not a scene of adult men with children. The Quran's language about Paradise is elevated, brief, and symbolic of perfected joy, not a clinical anatomy manual.
The critic's key move is the weakest one: "breasts beginning to rise" is converted into "Tanner stage two," then into "prepubescent," then into "sex with children." Classical Arabic was not using modern pediatric staging. Nor did the scholars cite this verse to say that Paradise contains minors for sexual use.
Virginity, restoration, and the hadith about strength
Indeed, We have produced them in a new creation and made them virgins, loving and equal in age, for the companions of the right.
Quran 56:35-38
This passage speaks about a new creation in Paradise: pure, loving, equal in age, and free from worldly defects. Some commentators mention that virginity is renewed. Even if one accepts that explanation, it is about miraculous perfection in a world with no pain, humiliation, coercion, bleeding, resentment, or abuse. It does not describe harming someone vulnerable.
As for the hadith, Tirmidhi narrates that the believer is given the sexual strength of many men in Paradise. The wording is about capacity, not predation, and not "a hundred prepubescent girls." Reports and tafsir must be read under the Quran's wider description of Paradise: no foul speech, no sin, no grief, no injustice, and no degradation.
They will not hear therein ill speech or commission of sin.
Quran 56:25
What this does and does not prove
The texts do establish that bodily pleasure, beauty, marriage, and intimacy are among the delights of Paradise. Islam does not treat the body as filthy, and it does not imagine salvation as disembodied boredom.
But they do not establish an eternity of sex with prepubescent girls. They do not establish coercion. They do not establish that women are mere objects; believing women also receive complete joy, honor, purification, and whatever their souls desire. Paradise is not a place where earthly predators finally get permission. It is the place where desire is purified and injustice is impossible.
So the objection succeeds only if one accepts a chain of assumptions the Quran itself does not make. Read in Arabic, in tafsir, and within the moral logic of Paradise, the claim collapses.